Biomaterial testing in contemporary orthodontics: Scope, protocol and testing apparatus

Published:December 23, 2022DOI:

      Highlights of the paper

      • The present article provides a new-age take on the various facilities available for orthodontic material testing.
      • It highlights the abundant scope of research that can be carried out in orthodontics with the help of an adjunct biomedical lab testing center.
      • It provides an immediate point-of comparison reference between two testing techniques which can help elevate present available evidence.


      The field of biomaterials has evolved significantly to include a wide spectrum of various disciplines which include biological and bioengineering sciences. Orthodontic applications as well as growing advances in digital dentistry has expanded the envelope of biomimetic requirements necessitating the need of new approaches in material testing. Efficient exchange of information and experience on material characterization along with application of novel approaches in assessing biological properties are some of the recent advents in material testing. Clinical trials on the performances of materials, orthodontically-induced surface alterations, tissue mechanics and polymer/resin properties are some of the rapidly developing trends in orthodontic biomaterial research. It is the need of the hour to provide the contemporary clinician with as much relevant evidence that can be garnered with the help of biomedical engineering in a research-adjunct manner.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Seminars in Orthodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Wagner WR
        • Sakiyama-Elbert SE
        • Zhang G
        • Yaszemski MJ
        Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine.
        (editors) Academic Press, 2020
        • Ebara M
        • Kotsuchibashi Y
        • Narain R
        • Idota N
        • Kim YJ
        • Hoffman JM
        • Uto K
        • Smart Aoyagi T.
        Springer, 2014
        • Ong JL
        • Appleford MR
        • Mani G.
        Introduction to Biomaterials: Basic Theory with Engineering Applications.
        Cambridge University Press, 2014
      1. (editor)Niinomi M Metals for Biomedical Devices. Woodhead publishing, 2019
        • Vaid N
        • Doshi V
        • Vandekar M.
        What's “Trend”ing in Orthodontic literature?.
        APOS Trends Orthodont. 2016; 6: 1
        • Xi P
        • Liu Y
        • Ren Q.
        Scanning and image reconstruction techniques in confocal laser scanning microscopy.
        Laser scanning, theory and applications. IntechOpen, 2011
        • Gogushev K
        • Abadzhiev M
        • Georgieva K
        • Denkov I.
        Intraoral scanning systems based on the principle of confocal laser microscopy used in the modern prosthetic dentistry.
        Varna Med Forum. 2017; 6: 80-85
        • Morsy N
        • El Kateb M.
        Accuracy of intraoral scanners for static virtual articulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple outcomes.
        J Pros Dent. 2022;
        • Tihaček-Šojić L
        • Milićević V
        • Đurić-Srejić M.
        Crystallographic and colorimetric analysis of dental enamel.
        Dent Anthropol J. 1997; 11: 5-11
        • Regulska K
        • Januszewicz B
        • Klimek L
        • Palatyńska-Ulatowska A.
        Analysis of the surface condition and changes in crystallographic structure of zirconium oxide affected by mechanical processing.
        Materials. 2021; 14: 4042
        • Inokoshi M
        • Shimizu H
        • Nozaki K
        • Takagaki T
        • Yoshihara K
        • Nagaoka N
        • Zhang F
        • Vleugels J
        • Van Meerbeek B
        • Minakuchi S.
        Crystallographic and morphological analysis of sandblasted highly translucent dental zirconia.
        Dent Mater. 2018; 34: 508-518
        • Azizi A
        • Jamilian A
        • Nucci F
        • Kamali Z
        • Hosseinikhoo N
        • Perillo L.
        Release of metal ions from round and rectangular NiTi wires.
        Prog Orthod. 2016; 17: 1-4
        • Lekka M.
        Cellular Analysis by Atomic Force Microscopy.
        Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2017
        • Chen CJ.
        Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Third Edition.
        Oxford University Press, USA2021 (Jan 29)
        • Verma P
        • Muthuswamy Pandian S.
        Bionic effects of nano hydroxyapatite dentifrice on demineralised surface of enamel post orthodontic debonding: in-vivo split mouth study.
        Prog Orthod. 2021; 22: 39
      2. (editor)Bellitto V Atomic Force Microscopy: Imaging, Measuring and Manipulating Surfaces at the Atomic Scale. BoD–Books on Demand, 2012
        • Kudryavin LA
        • Belyaev OF
        • Zavaruev VA
        • Shablygin MV.
        Use of an “Instron 1122” machine together with a digital oscilloscope.
        Fibre Chem. 2016; 48: 71-74
        • Quinzi V
        • Gallusi G
        • Carli E
        • Pepe F
        • Rastelli E
        • Tecco S
        Elastodontic devices in orthodontics: an in-vitro study on mechanical deformation under loading.
        Bioengineering. 2022; 9: 282
        • Calcagno BO.
        Acquisition of an Instron Electropuls E3000 Instrument for Mechanical Testing.
        University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez Mayaguez, Puerto Rico United States2015
        • Liu J.
        A novel motion generation strategy for robotic tooth brushing simulator.
        Ind Robot: Int J. 2013;
      3. Keerthana T, Ramesh S. Effect of three different dentifrices on enamel by automated brushing simulator-in vitro profilometric study. surfaces.;3:4.

        • Lorenz J
        • Schidtmann I
        • Morawietz M
        • Kiesow A
        • Wehrbein H
        • Sarembe S
        • Erbe C.
        In vitro surface analysis of the brushing resistance of orthodontic sealants using two different profilometric evaluation methods.
        Sci Rep. 2022; 12: 1-9
        • Wilson TG
        • Love B.
        Clinical effectiveness of fluoride-releasing elastomers. II. Enamel microhardness levels.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107: 379-381
        • Miresmaeili A
        • Farhadian N
        • Rezaei-Soufi L
        • Saharkhizan M
        • Veisi M.
        Effect of carbon dioxide laser irradiation on enamel surface microhardness around orthodontic brackets.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146: 161-165
        • Vieira TI
        • de Sousa Andrade KM
        • Cabral LM
        • Valença AM
        • Maia LC
        • Batista AU.
        Linear and areal surface roughness assessments for the study of tooth wear in human enamel.
        Clin Oral Investig. 2022; : 1
        • Faizee SH
        • Piradhiba R
        • Krishnaswamy NR
        • Suganthan PS.
        A Comparative Analysis of Surface Characteristics of Enamel after Conventional Acid Etching and Er, Cr: YSGG Laser Irradiation.
        J Clin Exp Dent. 2022; 14: e740
        • Hamza B
        • Sekularac M
        • Attin T
        • Wegehaupt FJ.
        In vitro evaluation of fissure sealants’ wear under erosive, abrasive and erosive/abrasive conditions.
        Eur Arch Paed Dent. 2022; : 1-7
        • Venugopal A
        • Vaid N
        • Bowman SJ.
        The quagmire of collegiality vs competitiveness.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159: 553-555
        • da Silveira RE
        • Elias CN
        • do Amaral FL.
        Assessment of frictional resistance and surface roughness in orthodontic wires coated with two different nanoparticles.
        Microsc Res Tech. 2022; 85: 1884-1890
        • Melvin EA
        • Yu Q
        • Xu X
        • Laird CG
        • Armbruster PC
        • Ballard RW.
        A comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with composite polishing systems following orthodontic debonding.
        Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33: 877-883
        • Leão CS
        • de Castro AC
        • Copello FM
        • Elias CN
        • Junior TS
        • Sant'Anna EF
        Comparison of feldspathic veneer surface treatments on ceramic bracket SBS, ARI and surface roughness after different debonding/polishing methods: an in vitro study.
        Int Orthod. 2021; 19: 679-684
        • Hamdoon SM
        • AlSamak S
        • Ahmed MK
        • Gasgoos S.
        Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials.
        Evaluation. 2022; 11: 34
        • Šimunović L
        • Blagec T
        • Vrankić A
        • Meštrović S.
        Color stability of orthodontic ceramic brackets and adhesives in potentially staining beverages—in vitro study.
        Dent J. 2022; 10: 115
        • Chami Vd
        • Gebert F
        • Assaf Dd
        • Centeno Ac
        • Ferrazzo Va
        • Durand Lb
        • Marquezan M.
        Color stability of resin composites for orthodontic attachments: an in vitro study.
        Dental Press J Orthod. 2022; 27
        • Sánchez-Tito M
        • Tay LY.
        Effect of an orthodontic resin modified with silver-nanoparticles on enamel color change.
        J Clin and Exp Dent. 2022; 14: e241
        • Guan W
        • Lockwood A
        • Inkson BJ
        • Möbus G.
        A piezoelectric goniometer inside a TEM goniometer.
        Microsc Microanal. 2010; 16: 1784-1785
        • Vaid NR.
        Digital technologies in orthodontics–an update.
        Semin Orthod. 2018; 24 (Elsevier): 373-375
        • Lee S
        • Lee C
        • Bosio JA
        • Melo MAS.
        Smart flexible 3D sensor for monitoring orthodontics forces: prototype design and proof of principle experiment.
        Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9
        • Knox CS.
        Influence of CAD/CAM on manufacturing systems.
        CAD/CAM Systems. CRC Press, 2020: 191-241
        • Dvorak K
        • Dvorakova J
        • Zarybnicka L
        • Horak Z.
        Influence of 3D printing topology by DMLS method on crack propagation.
        Materials. 2021; 14: 7483