Advertisement

3D printed aligners: Material science, workflow and clinical applications

  • Nearchos Panayi
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    School of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Clinic of Orthodontics & Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    private office Limassol, Cyprus
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jung-Yeol Cha
    Affiliations
    Director for Planning & Management Dental Hospital, Department of Orthodontics, Dental College, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonseiro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ki Beom Kim
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthodontics, Center for Advanced Dental Education, Saint Louis University, 3320 Rutger Street, Saint Louis, MO 63104, United States
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 11, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2022.12.007

      Abstract

      Clear aligner orthodontic treatment is not a new treatment modality. Treatment with the use of plastic invisible removable appliances counts more than 80 years when Kesling introduced the tooth positioner, Sheridan introduced the Essix aligner and Align technology its aligners. In-house designing and aligner fabrication has been around for more than 10 years. The last years a digital techonological and material advancement has changed the process of aligner manufacturing from the plastic foil thermoforming procedure to a direct aligner printing one. Direct aligner printing posses advantages and some disadvantages compared to the traditional thermoforming procedure. The aligner designing and printing workflow entails steps that are sensitive to errors that must be carefully analyzed and studied through scientific research. Due to the versatile printed aligner designing capabilities, aligners can be designed to fulfill specific clinical needs. A few evidence based scientific studies have been published which help to understand and optimize the final printed outcome. Despite that, more studies are needed in order to overcome difficulties and create an appliance that will meet the demands of a succesfull orthodontic treatment.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seminars in Orthodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kesling HD.
        The philosophy of the tooth positioning appliance.
        Am J Orthod. 1945; 31: 297-304
        • Nahoum H.
        The vacuum formed dental contour appliance.
        N Y State Dent J. 1964; 9: 385-390
        • Sheridan JJ
        • LeDoux W
        • McMinn R.
        Essix retainers: fabrication and supervision for permanent retention.
        J Clin Orthod. 1993; 27: 37-45
        • Sheridan JJ.
        Air-rotor stripping.
        J Clin Orthod. 1985; 19: 43-59
        • Ballard ML.
        Asymmetry in tooth size: a factor in the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of malocclusion.
        Angle Orthod. 1944; 14: 67-71
        • Can E
        • Panayi N
        • Polychronis G
        • Papageorgiou S
        • Zinelis S
        • Eliades G
        • et al.
        In-house 3D-printed aligners: effect of in vivo ageing on mechanical properties.
        Eur J Orthod. 2021; 44: 51-55
        • Panayi N
        • Eliades T.
        In-office 3-dimensional-printing: does the hype obscure the hazards for the operator?.
        Americ J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022; 161: 757-759
        • Koenig N
        • Choi JY
        • McCray J
        • Hayes A
        • Schneider P
        • Kim KB.
        Comparison of dimensional accuracy between direct-printed and thermoformed aligners.
        Korean J Orthod. 2022 Jul 25; 52: 249-257
        • Bucci R
        • Rongo R
        • Levatè C
        • Michelotti A
        • Barone S
        • Razionale AV
        • D'Antò V
        Thickness of orthodontic clear aligners after thermoforming and after 10 days of intraoral exposure: a prospective clinical study.
        Prog Orthod. 2019; 20: 36
        • Lee SY
        • Kim H
        • Kim HJ
        • Chung CJ
        • Choi YJ
        • Kim SJ
        • Cha JY.
        Thermo-mechanical properties of 3D printed photocurable shape memory resin for clear aligners.
        Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 15; 12: 6246
        • Ryu JH
        • Kwon JS
        • Jiang HB
        • Cha JY
        • Kim KM.
        Effects of thermoforming on the physical and mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials for transparent orthodontic aligners.
        Korean J Orthod. 2018; 48: 316-325
        • Gauthier M.
        • Stangel I.
        • Ellis T.
        • Zhu X.
        Oxygen inhibition in dental resins.
        J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 725-729
        • Hull C.
        On stereolithography.
        Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2012; 7 (177): 177
        • Vasiliadis A
        • Koukoulias N
        • Katakalos K.
        From three-dimensional (3D)- to 6D-printing technology in orthopedics: science fiction or scientific reality?.
        J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13: 101
        • Zinelis S
        • Panayi N
        • Polychronis G
        • Papageorgiou S
        • Eliades T.
        Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of orthodontic aligners produced by different contemporary 3D printers.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 25: 336-341
      1. Hertan E, McCray J, Bankhead B, Kim KB. Force profile assessment of direct-printed aligners versus thermoformed aligners and the effects of non-engaged surface patterns. Progress in Orthodontics. 2022;23(1).

        • Wu J
        • Liu Y
        • Peng W
        • Dong H
        • Zhang J.
        A biomechanical case study on the optimal orthodontic force on the maxillary canine tooth based on finite element analysis.
        J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018; 19: 535-546
        • Staples C
        • Dome P
        • Klecka G
        • Oblock S
        • Harris L.
        A review of the environmental fate, effects, and exposures of bisphenol A.
        Chemosphere. 1998; 36: 2149-2173
        • Swetanshu Khan I
        • Singh P
        • Srinivasan E.
        A systematic overview on treatment towards endocrine disruptors.
        Sustain Energy Technol Assessments. 2022; 53102688
        • Fenichel P
        • Chevalier N
        • Bisphenol Brucker-Davis F.
        A: an endocrine and metabolic disruptor.
        Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2013; 74: 211-220https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2013.04.002
        • Marzouk T
        • Sathyanarayana S
        • Kim A
        • Seminario A
        • McKinney C.
        A systematic review of exposure to bisphenol a from dental treatment.
        JDR Clinical &; TranslatRes. 2019; 4: 106-115
        • Kotyk MW
        • Wiltshire WA.
        An investigation into bisphenol-A leaching from orthodontic materials.
        Angle Orthod. 2014; 84: 516-520
        • Raghavan AS
        • Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H
        • Kailasam V
        • Padmanabhan S
        Comparative evaluation of salivary bisphenol A levels in patients wearing vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: an in-vivo study.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151: 471-476
        • Kim G
        • Go H
        • Yu J
        • Yang S
        • Kim K
        • Choi S
        • et al.
        Cytotoxicity, colour stability and dimensional accuracy of 3D printing resin with three different photoinitiators.
        Polymers. 2022; 14: 979
        • Pratsinis H
        • Papageorgiou S
        • Panayi N
        • Iliadi A
        • Eliades T
        • Kletsas D.
        Cytotoxicity and estrogenicity of a novel 3-dimensional printed orthodontic aligner.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022; 162: e116-e122
        • Willi A
        • Patcas R
        • Zervou S
        • Panayi N
        • Schätzle M
        • Eliades G
        • Hiskia A
        • Eliades T.
        Leaching from a 3D-printed aligner resin.
        Eur J Orthod. 2022; cjac056https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjac056
      2. Koletsi D, Panayi N, Laspos C, Athanasiou AE, Zinelis S, Eliades T. In vivo aging-induced surface roughness alterations of invisalign® and 3D-printed aligners. Journal of Orthodontics. 2022;146531252211459.

        • Cowley D.
        • Mah J.
        • O'Toole B.
        The effect of gingival-margin design on the retention of thermoformed aligners.
        J Clin Orthod. 2012; 46: 697-702