Advertisement

Digital workflows in orthodontic postgraduate training

Published:December 23, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2022.12.005

      Abstract

      Digital technology has completely reshaped the way we diagnose, treat, and follow-up our orthodontic patients. Tools such as digital models from intraoral scanners, 3D facial images and CBCTs have enlarged our diagnostic possibilities, still with some limitations. Following diagnosis, orthodontic treatments can now benefit largely from CAD/CAM approaches. These completely new workflows need to be integrated into postgraduate teaching, at the cost of certain challenges, which will be discussed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seminars in Orthodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bentson C.
        • Copple D.
        Opportunities in the evolving orthodontic industry - digital processes, teledentistry and group practices.
        Semin Orthod. 2022; 28: 37-42
        • Sonali Rehil K.S.
        • Sinha P.
        • Jain S.
        • Roberson G.
        • Chattopadhyay A.
        Education using clear aligners and digital workflows in graduate orthodontic residency programs.
        Semin Orthod. 2022; (?): 1-5
        • Grunheid T.
        • McCarthy S.D.
        • Larson B.E.
        Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146: 673-682
        • Rossini G.
        • Parrini S.
        • Castroflorio T.
        • Deregibus A.
        • Debernardi C.L.
        Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: a systematic review.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149: 161-170
        • Westerlund A.
        • van Diggelen F.
        • Johnsson A.C.
        • Kjellberg H.
        Bonded retainers maintain a high-standard orthodontic treatment outcome long term.
        J World Fed Orthod. 2014; 4: 78-84
        • Woodsend B.
        • Koufoudaki E.
        • Mossey P.A.
        • Lin P.
        Automatic recognition of landmarks on digital dental models.
        Comput Biol Med. 2021; 137104819
        • Gera A.
        • Gera S.
        • Dalstra M.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Cornelis MA.
        Validity and reproducibility of the peer assessment rating index scored on digital models using a software compared with traditional manual scoring.
        J Clin Med. 2021; 10
        • Hildebrand J.C.
        • Palomo J.M.
        • Palomo L.
        • Sivik M.
        • Hans M.
        Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 283-289
        • Scott J.D.
        • English J.D.
        • Cozad B.E.
        • Borders C.L.
        • Harris L.M.
        • Moon A.L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of automated grading of digital orthodontic models and hand grading of 3-dimensionally printed models.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155: 886-890
        • Westerlund A.
        • Tancredi W.
        • Ransjo M.
        • Bresin A.
        • Psonis S.
        • Torgersson O.
        Digital casts in orthodontics: a comparison of 4 software systems.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 147: 509-516
        • Lane C.
        • Harrell Jr., W.
        Completing the 3-dimensional picture.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 612-620
        • Kau C.H.
        • Olim S.
        • Nguyen J.T.
        The future of orthodontic diagnostic records.
        Semin Orthod. 2011; 17: 39-45
        • Thurzo A.
        • Strunga M.
        • Havlinova R.
        • Rehakova K.
        • Urban R.
        • Surovkova J.
        • et al.
        Smartphone-based facial scanning as a viable tool for facially driven orthodontics?.
        Sensors. 2022; 22 (Basel)
        • Rongo R.
        • Nissen L.
        • Leroy C.
        • Michelotti A.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        Three-dimensional soft tissue changes in orthodontic extraction and non-extraction patients: A prospective study.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 24: 181-192
        • Matthews H.S.
        • Penington A.J.
        • Hardiman R.
        • Fan Y.
        • Clement J.G.
        • Kilpatrick N.M.
        • et al.
        Modelling 3D craniofacial growth trajectories for population comparison and classification illustrated using sex-differences.
        Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 4771
        • Fan Y.
        • Liu Z.
        • Chen G.
        • Han B.
        • Song G.
        • Matthews H.
        • et al.
        Quantification and visualization of the tooth extraction effects on face with spatially dense geometric morphometrics.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2022;
        • Mozzo P.
        • Procacci C.
        • Tacconi A.
        • Martini P.T.
        • Andreis I.A.
        A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results.
        Eur Radiol. 1998; 8: 1558-1564
        • Scarfe W.C.
        • Li Z.
        • Aboelmaaty W.
        • Scott S.A.
        • Farman A.G.
        Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation.
        Aust Dent J. 2012; 57: 46-60
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Treccani M.
        • Carlsson K.
        • Thorgeirsson T.
        • Myrda A.
        • Cevidanes L.H.
        • et al.
        Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011; 14: 222-233
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Salih R.A.
        • Melsen B.
        Labio-lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self-ligating brackets.
        Angle Orthod. 2013; 83: 691-697
        • Morais J.F.
        • Melsen B.
        • de Freitas K.M.S.
        • Castello Branco N.
        • Garib D.G.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: a cone beam computed tomographic study.
        Angle Orthod. 2018; 88: 748-756
        • Linderup B.W.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Jensen J.
        • Kuseler A.
        Mandibular symphyseal bone graft for reconstruction of alveolar cleft defects: volumetric assessment with cone beam computed tomography 1-year postsurgery.
        Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016; 53: 64-72
        • Linderup B.W.
        • Kuseler A.
        • Jensen J.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        A novel semiautomatic technique for volumetric assessment of the alveolar bone defect using cone beam computed tomography.
        Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015; 52: e47-e55
        • Lenza M.G.
        • Lenza M.M.
        • Dalstra M.
        • Melsen B.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        An analysis of different approaches to the assessment of upper airway morphology: a CBCT study.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2010; 13: 96-105
        • Di Carlo G.
        • Gurani S.F.
        • Pinholt E.M.
        • Cattaneo PM.
        A new simple three-dimensional method to characterize upper airway in orthognathic surgery patient.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017; 4620170042
        • Isidor S.
        • Di Carlo G.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        • Isidor F.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        Three-dimensional evaluation of changes in upper airway volume in growing skeletal Class II patients following mandibular advancement treatment with functional orthopedic appliances.
        Angle Orthod. 2018; 88: 552-559
        • Gurani S.F.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Rafaelsen S.R.
        • Pedersen M.R.
        • Thorn J.J.
        • Pinholt E.M.
        The effect of altered head and tongue posture on upper airway volume based on a validated upper airway analysis-An MRI pilot study.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020; 23: 102-109
        • Gurani S.F.
        • Di Carlo G.
        • Thorn J.J.
        • Ingerslev J.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Pinholt E.M.
        Two-year postoperative upper airway cone-beam computed tomographic outcomes based on a verified upper airway analysis following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77: 1435-1445
        • Diaconu A.
        • Holte M.B.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Pinholt E.M.
        A semi-automatic approach for longitudinal 3D upper airway analysis using voxel-based registration.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022; 5120210253
        • Cornelis M.A.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        [Upper airways: tridimensional analysis and effect of treatment by functional appliances].
        Orthod Fr. 2019; 90: 337-342
        • Di Carlo G.
        • Polimeni A.
        • Melsen B.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015; 18: 1-11
        • Niu X.
        • Madhan S.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        Novel three-dimensional methods to analyze the morphology of the nasal cavity and pharyngeal airway.
        Angle Orthod. 2021; 91: 320-328
        • Niu X.
        • Moland J.
        • Pedersen T.K.
        • Bilgrau A.E.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Glerup M.
        • et al.
        Restricted upper airway dimensions in patients with dentofacial deformity from juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
        Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2022; 20: 32
        • Niu X.
        • Motro M.
        • Will L.A.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        Does rapid maxillary expansion enlarge the nasal cavity and pharyngeal airway? A three-dimensional assessment based on validated analyses.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 24: 124-133
        • Di Carlo G.
        • Gili T.
        • Caldarelli G.
        • Polimeni A.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        A community detection analysis of malocclusion classes from orthodontics and upper airway data.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 24: 172-180
        • Madhan S.
        • Holte M.B.
        • Diaconu A.
        • Thorne J.J.
        • Ingerslev J.
        • Nascimento G.G.
        • et al.
        Pharyngeal airway changes five years after bimaxillary surgery – a retrospective study.
        J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2022;
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Yung A.K.C.
        • Holm A.
        • Mashaly O.M.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        3D landmarks of Craniofacial Imaging and subsequent considerations on superimpositions in orthodontics-The Aarhus perspective.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019; 22: 21-29
        • Staderini E.
        • Guglielmi F.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        • Cattaneo PM.
        Three-dimensional prediction of roots position through cone-beam computed tomography scans-digital model superimposition: a novel method.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019; 22: 16-23
        • Brown M.W.
        • Koroluk L.
        • Ko C.C.
        • Zhang K.
        • Chen M.
        • Nguyen T.
        Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148: 1067-1074
        • Penning E.W.
        • Peerlings R.H.J.
        • Govers J.D.M.
        • Rischen R.J.
        • Zinad K.
        • Bronkhorst E.M.
        • et al.
        Orthodontics with customized versus noncustomized appliances: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
        J Dent Res. 2017; 96: 1498-1504
        • Czolgosz I.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Cornelis MA.
        Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial.
        Eur J Orthod. 2021; 43: 144-151
        • Graf S.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        • Hauber Gameiro G.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        Computer-aided design and manufacture of hyrax devices: can we really go digital?.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 152: 870-874
        • Gera S.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Hartig L.E.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        Computer-aided design and manufacturing of bone- and tooth-borne maxillary protraction with miniscrews and class III elastics: can we contemporize Class III treatments in growing patients?.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159: 125-132
        • Sofrata A.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        Computer-aided design and manufacture of a milled Twin-block: Workflow and use in a clinical patient. Have we entered the digital era?.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Clin Companion. 2022;
        • Graf S.
        • Tarraf N.E.
        • Vasudavan S.
        Direct printed removable appliances: a new approach for the Twin-block appliance.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022; 162: 103-107
        • Koenig N.
        • Choi J.Y.
        • McCray J.
        • Hayes A.
        • Schneider P.
        • Kim K.B.
        Comparison of dimensional accuracy between direct-printed and thermoformed aligners.
        Korean J Orthod. 2022; 52: 249-257
        • Jindal P.
        • Juneja M.
        • Siena F.L.
        • Bajaj D.
        • Breedon P.
        Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156: 694-701
        • Elshazly T.M.
        • Keilig L.
        • Alkabani Y.
        • Ghoneima A.
        • Abuzayda M.
        • Talaat W.
        • et al.
        Potential application of 4D technology in fabrication of orthodontic aligners.
        Front Mater. 2022; 8
        • Katsaros C.
        • Livas C.
        • Renkema AM.
        Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132: 838-841
        • Gera A.
        • Pullisaar H.
        • Cattaneo P.M.
        • Gera S.
        • Vandevska-Radunovic V.
        • Cornelis M.A.
        Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.
        Eur J Orthod. 2022;
        • Gelin E.
        • Seidel L.
        • Bruwier A.
        • Albert A.
        • Charavet C.
        Innovative customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer versus standard stainless-steel lingual retainer: A randomized controlled trial.
        Korean J Orthod. 2020; 50: 373-382
        • Shim H.
        • Foley P.
        • Bankhead B.
        • Kim K.B.
        Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD/CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patients.
        Angle Orthod. 2022; 92: 87-94
        • Jacox L.A.
        • Mihas P.
        • Cho C.
        • Lin F.C.
        • Ko CC.
        Understanding technology adoption by orthodontists: a qualitative study.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155: 432-442