Advertisement

Insights into concepts, protocols, and evidence of surgery-first orthognathic approach-The journey so far

Published:December 02, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2022.11.004

      Abstract

      The aim of this narrative review was to comprehensively describe the surgery-first orthognathic approach (SFOA) or the surgery-first approach (SFA) in terms of the concept, procedure selection and evidence available to date. Comparisons with the conventional orthognathic surgery approach (COSA) are also made. In the light of newer advances in technology, including but not limited, to augmented reality - virtual treatment objective setup, 3D imaging, and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM), the “one patient two problems concept” needs to be thoroughly understood to further enhance both patients’ quality of life and practitioners’ clinical skills. Undoubtedly, gathering higher levels of evidence from future randomized control trials (RCTs) and developing standard core outcomes (COS) on SFOA are the need of the hour.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seminars in Orthodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Choi JW
        • Bradley JP.
        Surgery first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment: questions and answers.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28: 1330-1333
        • Proffit WR
        • Miguel JA.
        The duration and sequencing of surgical orthodontic treatment.
        Int J Adult Orthod Orthognathic Surg. 1995; 10: 35-42
        • Proffit WR
        • White RP.
        Development of surgeon-orthodontist interaction in orthognathic surgery.
        Semin Orthod. 2011; 17: 183-185
        • Gandedkar NH
        • Chng CK
        • Tan W.
        Surgery-first orthognathic approach case series: Salient features and guidelines.
        J Orthod Sci. 2016; 5: 35-42
        • Oh CO
        • Son HB.
        Functional orthognathic surgery (1).
        Kor J Clin Orthod. 2002; 1: 32-39
        • Nagasaka H
        • Sugawara J
        • Kawamura H
        • et al.
        Surgery first” skeletal Class III correction using the skeletal anchorage system.
        J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43: 97-105
        • Choi JW
        • Lee JY
        • Yang SJ
        • et al.
        The reliability of a surgery- first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal class III dentofacial deformity.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 74: 333-341
        • Sugawara J
        • Aymach Z
        • Nagasaka DH
        • et al.
        Surgery first” orthognathics to correct a skeletal class II malocclusion with an impinging bite.
        J Clin Orthod. 2010; 44: 429-438
        • Liou EJ
        • Chen PH
        • Wang YC
        • et al.
        Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 781-785
        • Pelo S
        • Saponaro G
        • Patini R
        • et al.
        Risks in surgery-first orthognathic approach: complications of segmental osteotomies of the jaws. A systematic review.
        Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017; 21: 4-12
        • Pelo S
        • Gasparini G
        • Garagiola U
        • et al.
        Surgery-first orthognathic approach vs traditional orthognathic approach: oral health-related quality of life assessed with 2 questionnaires.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017; 152: 250-254
        • Yu HB
        • Mao LX
        • Wang D
        • et al.
        The surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study of 50 cases.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44: 1463-1467
        • Choi DS
        • Garagiola U
        • Kim SG.
        Current status of the surgery-first approach (part I): concepts and orthodontic protocols.
        Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 41: 10
        • Kwon TG
        • Han MD.
        Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications.
        Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 41: 23
        • Jung J
        • Moon SH
        • Kwon YD.
        Current status of surgery-first approach (part III): the use of 3D technology and the implication in obstructive sleep apnea.
        Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 42: 1
        • Yao K
        • Zhu G
        • Chen M
        • Zhang B
        • Wu Y
        • Li P.
        Effect of surgery-first orthognathic approach on oral health-related quality of life.
        Angle Orthod. 2020; 90 (Erratum in: Angle Orthod 2021;91:279-281): 723-733
        • Huang X
        • Cen X
        • Sun W
        • et al.
        The impact of surgery-first approach on the oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 136
        • Zingler S
        • Hakim E
        • Finke D
        • et al.
        Surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: Psychological and biological aspects—a prospective cohort study.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45: 1293-1301
        • Uribe FA
        • Farrell B.
        Surgery-First Approach in the Orthognathic Patient.
        Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020; 32: 89-103
        • Barone S
        • Morice A
        • Picard A
        • et al.
        Surgery-first orthognathic approach vs conventional orthognathic approach: A systematic review of systematic reviews.
        J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 122: 162-172
        • Reddy NVV
        • Potturi A.
        • Bonanthaya K
        • Panneerselvam E
        • Manuel S
        Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach.
        (editors)Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician. Springer, Singapore2021: 1463-1477
        • Monaghan L
        • Ward S.
        Does a surgery first approach to orthognathic treatment of class III skeletal relations result in a shorter duration of treatment? A systematic review.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 59: 1148-1156
        • Hernández-Alfaro F
        • Mezquida-Fernández C
        • Brabyn PJ
        • et al.
        Redefining our protocol of the orthognathic surgery-first approach after 10 years of experience.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 60: 1102-1107
        • Valls-Ontañón A
        • Triginer-Roig S
        • Trujillo I
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional evaluation of postoperative stability: a comparative study between surgery-first and surgery-late protocols.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; S0901-5027: 00281-00288
        • Park YW
        • Kwon KJ
        • Kang YJ
        • et al.
        Surgery-first approach reduces the overall treatment time without damaging long-term stability in the skeletal class III correction: a preliminary study.
        Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 43: 27
        • Hoang TA
        • Lee KC
        • Chuang SK.
        The surgery-first approach to orthognathic surgery.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2021; 32: e153-e156
        • Peiró-Guijarro MA
        • Guijarro-Martínez R
        • Hernández-Alfaro F.
        Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review of the literature.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149: 448-462
        • Kim JW
        • Kim JC
        • Jeong CG
        • et al.
        The accuracy and stability of the maxillary position after orthognathic surgery using a novel computer-aided surgical simulation system.
        BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 18
        • Hwang HS
        • Oh MH
        • Oh HK
        • et al.
        Surgery-first approach in correcting skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 15: 255-267
        • Fawzy HH
        • Choi JW.
        Evaluation of virtual surgical plan applicability in 3D simulation-guided two-jaw surgery.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47: 860-866
        • Zhou Y
        • Li Z
        • Wang X
        • et al.
        Progressive changes in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated by 2-jaw surgery with minimal and conventional presurgical orthodontics: A comparative study.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149: 244-252
        • Holzinger D
        • Juergens P
        • Shahim K
        • et al.
        Accuracy of soft tissue prediction in surgery-first treatment concept in orthognathic surgery: A prospective study.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018; 46: 1455-1460
        • Ko EW
        • Hsu SS
        • Hsieh HY
        • et al.
        Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 1469-1477
        • Park HM
        • Yang IH
        • Choi JY
        • et al.
        Postsurgical relapse in Class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery: conventional three-stage method versus surgery-first approach.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26: 2357-2363
        • Han JJ
        • Jung S
        • Park HJ
        • et al.
        Evaluation of postoperative mandibular positional changes after mandibular setback surgery in a surgery-first approach: isolated mandibular surgery versus bimaxillary surgery.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 (181.e1-181)
        • Yang L
        • Xiao YD
        • Liang YJ
        • et al.
        Does the surgery-first approach produce better outcomes in orthognathic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75: 2422-2429
        • Soverina D
        • Gasparini G
        • Pelo S
        • et al.
        Skeletal stability in orthognathic surgery with the surgery first approach: a systematic review.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 48: 930-940
        • Wei H
        • Liu Z
        • Zang J
        • et al.
        Surgery-first/early-orthognathic approach may yield poorer postoperative stability than conventional orthodontics-first approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 126: 107-116
        • Guo J
        • Wang T
        • Han JJ
        • et al.
        Corrective outcome and transverse stability after orthognathic surgery using a surgery-first approach in mandibular prognathism with and without facial asymmetry.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 126: 22-30
        • Ferguson DJ
        • Vaid NR
        • Wilcko MT.
        Assessing accelerated tooth movement technique on their own catabolic merits: a review.
        J World Fed Orthod. 2018; 7: 122-127
        • Schilling T
        • Muller M
        • Minne HW
        • et al.
        Influence of inflammation-mediated osteopenia on the regional acceleratory phenomenon and the systemic acceleratory phenomenon during healing of a bone defect in the rat.
        Calcif Tissue Int. 1998; 63: 160-166
        • Al-Dohan AM
        • TS Al-Jewair
        Limited evidence suggests that presurgical orthodontics may not be needed for orthognathic surgery patients.
        J Evid Dent Pract. 2017; 17: 39-41
        • Jeong WS
        • Choi JW
        • Kim DY
        • et al.
        Can a surgery-first orthognathic approach reduce the total treatment time?.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 46 (Erratum in: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46:1203): 473-482
        • Brucoli M
        • Zeppegno P
        • Benech R
        • et al.
        Psychodynamic features associated with orthognathic surgery: a comparison between conventional orthognathic treatment and ‘‘surgery-first’’ approach.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77: 157-163
        • Lowe AA
        • Fleetham JA
        • Adachi S
        • et al.
        Cephalometric and computed tomographic predictors of obstructive sleep apnea severity.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107: 589-595
        • Riley R
        • Guilleminault C
        • Powell N
        • et al.
        Mandibular osteotomy and hyoid bone advancement for obstructive sleep apnea: a case report.
        Sleep. 1984; 7: 79-82
        • Gandedkar NH
        • Chng CK
        • Por YC
        • et al.
        Influence of bimaxillary surgery on pharyngeal airway in Class III deformities and effect on sleep apnea: a STOP-BANG questionnaire and cone-beam computed tomography study.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75: 2411-2421
        • Agarwal SS
        • Datana S
        • Sahoo NK
        • et al.
        Evaluation of airway dimensions following mandibular setback with surgery-first orthognathic versus conventional orthognathic approach.
        J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021; 20: 296-303
        • Vaid NR
        • Doshi V
        • Vandekar M.
        What's the ‘trend'ing in orthodontic literature?.
        APOS Trends Orthod. 2016; 6: 1-4
        • Gandedkar NH
        • Davila MMC
        • Chng CK
        • et al.
        Surgery-first orthognathic approach: A “scoping review” for mapping outcomes and plausible recommendations to develop core outcomes sets.
        APOS Trends Orthod. 2019; 9: 77-88