Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 28, ISSUE 3, P123-135, September 2022

Maxillary incisor position-based orthodontic treatment with miniscrews

  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors (Sungsu Heo and Jae Hyun Park) contributed equally to this work.
    Sungsu Heo
    Footnotes
    1 These authors (Sungsu Heo and Jae Hyun Park) contributed equally to this work.
    Affiliations
    Private practice in “Goodsmile orthodontic office”, Cheongju, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors (Sungsu Heo and Jae Hyun Park) contributed equally to this work.
    Jae Hyun Park
    Footnotes
    1 These authors (Sungsu Heo and Jae Hyun Park) contributed equally to this work.
    Affiliations
    Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University, Mesa, Ariz; International Scholar, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mi-Young Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthodontics, Seoul National University Gwan-ak Dental Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jae-Soo Kim
    Affiliations
    Private practice in “The prettiest Orthodontic Dental clinic”, Incheon, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Seung Pil Jung
    Affiliations
    Private practice in “Ilsan whitedream dental clinic”, Goyang, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    2 Visiting Scholar, Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A. T. Still University, Mesa, Ariz
    Jong-Moon Chae
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Footnotes
    2 Visiting Scholar, Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A. T. Still University, Mesa, Ariz
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Wonkwang, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, Daejeon Dental Hospital, 77 Doonsan–ro, Seo-Gu, Daejeon 35233, South Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 These authors (Sungsu Heo and Jae Hyun Park) contributed equally to this work.
    2 Visiting Scholar, Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A. T. Still University, Mesa, Ariz
Published:October 27, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2022.10.011

      Abstract

      Traditionally, orthodontic diagnosis and treatment have primarily involved the assessment of skeletodental relationships, with a particular focus on the mandibular dentition. Recently the focus has shifted towards the maxillary incisors as a starting point for facial esthetics with growing demands for facial esthetics. Three-dimensional maxillary incisor position (MIP) plays a pivotal role in improving facial esthetics in smiling and resting positions. With the advent of miniscrews, biomechanical force application in orthodontic treatment has become simpler due to absolute anchorage. Miniscrews allow clinicians to move teeth more precisely and easily in three dimensions according to the treatment plan, which was challenging or impossible with conventional biomechanics. Therefore, MIP using miniscrews should be a starting point for esthetic treatment planning.

      Introduction

      Improving facial and smile esthetics has gained popularity with the introduction of the soft tissue paradigm and has become a principal goal in orthodontic treatment.
      • Ackerman JL
      • Proffit WR
      • Sarver DM.
      The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
      Since the introduction and use of miniscrews, the envelope of discrepancy has been broadened compared to conventional methods.
      • Choi SH
      • Jeon JY
      • Lee KJ
      • Hwang CJ.
      Clinical applications of miniscrews that broaden the scope of non-surgical orthodontic treatment.
      • Lee KJ
      • Kim SJ.
      Advanced biomechanics for total arch movement and non-surgical treatment for hyperdivergent faces.
      • Chae JM.
      A new protocol of Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage.
      Importantly, the center of resistance (CR) of the total or segmental dentition must be considered to achieve a desired biomechanical tooth movement with miniscrews (Fig. 1).
      • Park JH
      • Heo S
      • Tai K
      • Kojima Y
      • Kook YA
      • Chae JM.
      Biomechanical considerations for total distalization of the mandibular dentition in the treatment of Class III malocclusion.
      • Kawamura J
      • Park JH
      • Kojima Y
      • Tamaya N
      • Kook YA
      • Kyung HM
      • Chae JM.
      Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the maxillary dentition: a finite element study.
      • Jo AR
      • Mo SS
      • Lee KJ
      • Sung SJ
      • Chun YS.
      Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition.
      • Jeong GM
      • Sung SJ
      • Lee KJ
      • Chun YS
      • Mo SS.
      Finite-element investigation of the center of resistance of the maxillary dentition.
      • Chae JM
      • Park JH
      • Kojima Y
      • Tai K
      • Kook YA
      • Kyung HM.
      Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the mandibular dentition: a finite element study.
      Fig 1
      Fig. 1Estimated center of resistance (CR: violet color, six anterior teeth; red color, total arch). (A) Maxillary dentition; (B) Mandibular dentition.
      Fig 2
      Fig. 2The influence of the steepness of the maxillary occlusal plane (OP) on the smile arc and projection of the chin point. (A) Steep OP; (B) Normal OP; (C) Flat OP. The steeper OP tends to lead to a more curved smile arc and a more posterior position of the chin point. The flatter OPA tends to lead to a less curved or reversed arc curve and a more forward position of the mandible.
      Maxillary incisor position (MIP) plays an important role in esthetics with smiling and resting states and in supporting the lower lip and functional occlusion.
      • Machado AW.
      Mechanics to enhance facial and smile esthetics.
      • Holdaway RA.
      A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I.
      • Holdaway RA.
      A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
      • Arnett GW
      • Jelic JS
      • Kim J
      • Cummings DR
      • Beress A
      • Worley Jr, CM
      • Chung B
      • Bergman R
      Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity.
      • Sarver DM.
      The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
      Holdaway
      • Holdaway RA.
      A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I.
      ,
      • Holdaway RA.
      A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
      first suggested maxillary incisors as the best teeth for esthetic prognosis as they determine upper and lower lip posture. Sarver
      • Sarver DM.
      The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
      and Arnett and coworkers
      • Arnett GW
      • Jelic JS
      • Kim J
      • Cummings DR
      • Beress A
      • Worley Jr, CM
      • Chung B
      • Bergman R
      Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity.
      suggested that the maxillary incisors significantly impact on facial and smile esthetics. In particular, Sarver
      • Sarver DM.
      The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
      proposed that the amount of maxillary incisor display when smiling and speaking is one of the most decisive components in esthetic judgment.
      Therefore, in this article, we will present the maxillary incisor-based diagnosis and treatment planning with miniscrews and illustrate clinical cases where appropriate biomechanics was used to achieve optimal facial balance and smile esthetics.

      Factors that affect smile esthetics (Fig. 2)

      MIP is one of the most important factors in the enhancement of smile esthetics. The ideal vertical MIP should be determined by establishing 2-4 mm of incisal show at a relaxed lip position,
      • Al Taki A
      • Yaqoub S
      • Hassan M
      Legan-burstone soft tissue profile values in a Circassian adult sample.
      ,
      • Jeelani W
      • Fida M
      • Shaikh A.
      The maxillary incisor display at rest: analysis of the underlying components.
      1-3 mm of gum exposure on smiling,
      • Ezquerra F
      • Berrazueta MJ
      • Ruiz-Capillas A
      • Arregui JS.
      New approach to the gummy smile.
      and a smile arc.
      • Sarver DM.
      The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
      Of these, maxillary incisor exposure at rest position is the most important factor in determining the vertical MIP and the amount of vertical movement of the maxillary incisors. The maxillary incisors should also have the proper inclination and be positioned favorably in horizontal and vertical relationships to all facial structures to ensure maximum facial harmony.
      • Choi SH
      • Jeon JY
      • Lee KJ
      • Hwang CJ.
      Clinical applications of miniscrews that broaden the scope of non-surgical orthodontic treatment.
      ,
      • Sangalli L
      • Dalessandri D
      • Bonetti S
      • Mandelli G
      • Visconti L
      • Savoldi F.
      Proposed parameters of optimal central incisor positioning in orthodontic treatment planning: a systematic review.
      • Janzen EK.
      A balanced smile–a most important treatment objective.
      • Klontz HA.
      Facial balance and harmony: an attainable objective for the patient with a high mandibular plane angle.
      • Zarif Najafi H
      • Oshagh M
      • Khalili MH
      • Torkan S
      Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination in smiling profiles with respect to mandibular position.
      MIP can also greatly affect smile arcs and types.
      The smile arc is one of the most important components when evaluating smile esthetics.
      • Sarver DM.
      The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
      It has been defined as the relationship of the curvature of the maxillary incisal and canine edges to the curvature of the lower lip during a posed smile. Factors that contribute to an ideal smile arc relationship may include the lengths of the maxillary teeth, the inclination of the maxillary incisors, arch width, arch form, the curvature of the lower lip, and the occlusal plane angle (OPA). Hulsey
      • Hulsey CM.
      An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile.
      reported that one-third of orthodontically treated patients had flatter smile arcs compared to control patients who were not orthodontically treated. Smile arc flattening during orthodontic treatment can occur in several ways due to formulated bracket positioning and injudicious intrusion of the maxillary incisors with miniscrews. Standardized bracket positioning and palatal expansion in the maxillary arch may result in a loss of the maxillary incisor curvature relative to the lower lip curvature.
      • Sarver DM.
      The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
      ,
      • Sarver DM
      • Ackerman MB.
      Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies.
      ,
      • Lee KJ
      • Choi SH
      • Choi TH
      • Shi KK
      • Keum BT.
      Maxillary transverse expansion in adults: rationale, appliance design, and treatment outcomes.
      Therefore, it is important to assess the MIP-smile arc relationship and modify the bracket position to achieve a consonant smile arc.
      Smiles can be divided into high, medium, and low types depending on the amount of gingival exposure and upper lip elevation with a posed smile.
      • Ezquerra F
      • Berrazueta MJ
      • Ruiz-Capillas A
      • Arregui JS.
      New approach to the gummy smile.
      Vertical MIP relative to the upper lip should be examined to evaluate the amount of maxillary incisor exposure not only on smiling but also with lips in the resting position. When a patient displays a gummy smile even though this is the normal maxillary incisor exposure at rest,
      • Chae JM.
      Nonextraction treatment of Class II division 2 in an adult patient using microimplant anchorage (MIA).
      neuromuscular correction with botulinum toxin might be necessary.
      • Polo M.
      Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) for the neuromuscular correction of excessive gingival display on smiling (gummy smile).
      ,
      • Hwang WS
      • Hur MS
      • Hu KS
      • Song WC
      • Koh KS
      • Baik HS
      • Kim ST
      • Kim HJ
      • Lee KJ.
      Surface anatomy of the lip elevator muscles for the treatment of gummy smile using botulinum toxin.
      OPA control during orthodontic treatment should be an integral part of treatment planning.
      • Lamarque S.
      The importance of occlusal plane control during orthodontic mechanotherapy.
      Changing the OPA affects the relative smile attractiveness and chin projection of the facial profile.
      • Lamarque S.
      The importance of occlusal plane control during orthodontic mechanotherapy.
      • Sarver DM.
      Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
      • Batwa W
      • Hunt NP
      • Petrie A
      • Gill D.
      Effect of occlusal plane on smile attractiveness.
      The OPA slope can affect smile arc and chin projection. When the maxillary OP is flattened with Class III elastics, the maxillary incisal display might decrease, resulting in a flat smile arc.
      • Park JH
      • Yu J
      • Bullen R.
      Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with conventional orthodontic therapy.
      ,
      • Park JH
      • Emamy M
      • Lee SH.
      Adult skeletal Class III correction with camouflage orthodontic treatment.
      On the contrary, Class II elastics may steepen the OP, which might increase the curve of the smile arc, but this could also make the smile less attractive.
      • Sarver DM.
      The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
      ,
      • Batwa W
      • Hunt NP
      • Petrie A
      • Gill D.
      Effect of occlusal plane on smile attractiveness.
      ,
      • Nakamura M
      • Kawanabe N
      • Kataoka T
      • Murakami T
      • Yamashiro T
      • Kamioka H.
      Comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes between temporary anchorage devices and Class III elastics in Class III malocclusions.
      • Maulik C
      • Nanda R.
      Dynamic smile analysis in young adults.
      • Mangal U
      • Park JH
      • Lim SH
      • Choi SK
      • Chae JM.
      Control of occlusal plane in orthognathic surgery.
      Furthermore, a transverse cant of OPA can cause a negative effect on the smile attractiveness.
      • Parrini S
      • Rossini G
      • Castroflorio T
      • Fortini A
      • Deregibus A
      • Debernardi C.
      Laypeople's perceptions of frontal smile esthetics: a systematic review.
      Therefore, OP control should be carefully considered to improve the smile arc and facial profile.

      MIP-based treatment planning

      There are five steps in the cephalometric treatment process to optimize facial and smile esthetics and occlusal results with the use of miniscrews (Fig. 3):
      • 1.
        Evaluate the vertical position, inclination, and symmetry of the maxillary incisors and maxillary incisor exposure when smiling and at rest. Plan to control the 3-dimensional (3D) position of the maxillary incisors based on the facial and smile esthetics.
      • 2.
        Evaluate the OP in both arches. Plan to control the OP by vertical movement of the anterior and posterior segments in both arches.
      • 3.
        Evaluate for lip incompetency, chin deficiency, and anterior facial height. Plan to control the vertical and horizontal dimensions with extraction or total dentition movement.
      • 4.
        Evaluate the vertical and horizontal position of the chin. Plan to control the mandibular autorotation to achieve a proper overbite and a favorable facial profile by vertical control of the dentition with miniscrews.
      • 5.
        Evaluate the vertical position, inclination, and symmetry of the mandibular incisors and their relationship with the maxillary incisors. Plan to control the 3D position of the mandibular incisors to achieve an optimal relationship and to avoid premature contact with the maxillary incisors during autorotation of the mandible.
      Fig 3
      Fig. 3Five steps for cephalometric treatment planning to optimize facial and occlusal traits. (1) Determine the three-dimensional position of the maxillary incisors; (2) Determine the occlusal plane angle; (3) Assess lip incompetency and chin projection; (4) Determine the autorotation of the mandible; (5) Determine the position of the mandibular incisors.
      Additionally, vertical change of the upper lip should be evaluated depending on the vertical control of the maxillary incisors, anterior facial height, and facial pattern because it could affect the maxillary incisor exposure on smiling and at rest.
      • Hayashida H
      • Ioi H
      • Nakata S
      • Takahashi I
      • Counts AL.
      Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults.
      • Mirabella D
      • Bacconi S
      • Gracco A
      • Lombardo L
      • Siciliani G.
      Upper lip changes correlated with maxillary incisor movement in 65 orthodontically treated adult patients.
      • Li H
      • Cao T
      • Zhou H
      • Hou Y.
      Lip position analysis of young women with different skeletal patterns during posed smiling using 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.
      • Lima APB
      • Conti ACCF
      • Filho LC
      • Cardoso MA
      • Almeida-Pedrin RR.
      Influence of facial pattern in smile attractiveness regarding gingival exposure assessed by dentists and laypersons.
      And in some cases, during the maxillary anterior teeth retraction with conventional biomechanics, they are prone to extrude and upright, causing premature contact with the mandibular anterior teeth and deteriorating smile esthetics and facial profile. Therefore, vertical and torque control of the maxillary incisors is of utmost importance to improve and maintain an esthetic smile. Assuming that the center of the mandibular rotation is located around the condyle, even though a large individual variation was found locating the center of rotation, the amount of incisal movement should be greater than that of the molar movement.

      Types of maxillary incisor tooth movement for an esthetic smile

      Orthodontic maxillary incisor tooth movement should be determined from esthetical and functional occlusal standpoints. Additionally, the OPA should be changed depending on the MIP. Four types of maxillary incisal tooth movement are illustrated in Figure 4. The resultant tooth movement pattern of the maxillary incisors largely depends on the relationship between the line of force and the CR. Therefore, localization of the target segments’ CR is crucial when predicting and interpreting the displacement pattern of the dental arch in response to the lines of force from the miniscrews.
      Fig 4
      Fig. 4Required types of tooth movement of the maxillary incisors. With Class II malocclusion: (A) Intrusive retraction with controlled tipping; (B) Bodily retraction along the occlusal plane. With Class III malocclusion: (C) Extrusive decompensation with uncontrolled tipping; (D) Bodily protraction along the occlusal plane.
      In clinical situations, the line of force is confined by anatomical limitations. Sometimes, it is recommended to use an equivalent force system to achieve the desired displacement of an active unit. According to recent finite element studies, we can identify the estimated location of the active unit's CR and simulate displacement of the dentition depending on the force angulations (FAs) and develop a theoretical basis for 3D tooth movement patterns (Fig. 1).
      • Park JH
      • Heo S
      • Tai K
      • Kojima Y
      • Kook YA
      • Chae JM.
      Biomechanical considerations for total distalization of the mandibular dentition in the treatment of Class III malocclusion.
      • Kawamura J
      • Park JH
      • Kojima Y
      • Tamaya N
      • Kook YA
      • Kyung HM
      • Chae JM.
      Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the maxillary dentition: a finite element study.
      • Jo AR
      • Mo SS
      • Lee KJ
      • Sung SJ
      • Chun YS.
      Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition.
      • Jeong GM
      • Sung SJ
      • Lee KJ
      • Chun YS
      • Mo SS.
      Finite-element investigation of the center of resistance of the maxillary dentition.
      • Chae JM
      • Park JH
      • Kojima Y
      • Tai K
      • Kook YA
      • Kyung HM.
      Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the mandibular dentition: a finite element study.
      Therefore, the treatment objectives must be clarified prior to the construction of a force system.

      Case reports

      We present four cases illustrating MIP-based treatment planning to achieve optimal facial balance and smile esthetics in Class II or III patients with hyper- or hypodivergency (Fig. 5).
      Fig 5
      Fig. 5Autorotation of the mandible with extrusion and intrusion of the dentition considering maxillary incisor position (MIP)-based treatment planning. (A) Upward and forward mandibular spatial change (forward rotation of the mandible) with intrusive mechanics in the Class II hyperdivergent patient. (B) Downward and backward mandibular spatial change (backward rotation of the mandible) by extrusive mechanics in the Class III hypodivergent patient.

      Case 1: Total intrusion and distalization of the maxillary dentition with miniscrews in a Class II hyperdivergent adult patient with lip incompetency

      A 22-year-old male patient presented with complaints of severe lip protrusion and chin deficiency. The patient showed lip incompetency even though he had been treated orthodontically with four premolar extractions. He displayed a hyperdivergent facial pattern with a Class II dental relationship and a large overjet. The maxillary incisor exposure when smiling was normal (Fig. 6). Total intrusion and distalization of the maxillary dentition were achieved using maxillary posterior and anterior buccal, and midpalatal miniscrews (Fig. 7). A Class I dental relationship and favorable facial profile were accomplished with distalization and intrusion of the maxillary dentition, mesialization of the mandibular dentition, backward rotation of the OP, and forward autorotation of the mandible. A good smile arc with appropriate gum exposure when smiling was obtained by vertical and torque control of the maxillary incisors using miniscrews (Fig. 8). The overall treatment time was 29 months.
      Fig 6
      Fig. 6Case 1: Pretreatment photographs and radiographs.
      Fig 7
      Fig. 7Case 1: Total intrusion and distalization of the maxillary dentition with interradicular and midpalatal miniscrews.
      Fig 8
      Fig. 8Case 1: Posttreatment photographs and radiographs and pre- and posttreatment superimposition.

      Case 2: Total intrusion of the maxillary and mandibular dentitions and anterior teeth intrusive retraction with miniscrews in a severe hyperdivergent adult patient

      A 30-year-old female patient presented with lip protrusion and chin deficiency. She showed moderate crowding, unilateral scissors bite on the left side, and slight left-up canting of the upper lip and maxillary anterior teeth. She displayed a hyperdivergent facial pattern with a Class I dental relationship and anterior edge-to-edge bite (Fig. 9). The total intrusion of the maxillary and mandibular dentitions and intrusive anterior teeth retraction were achieved using each maxillary and mandibular four buccal miniscrews (Fig. 10). A favorable facial profile was accomplished with the total intrusion of dentition and retraction of the anterior teeth in both arches with no rotation of OP, correction of the scissors bite, reduction of the anterior facial height, and forward autorotation of the mandible. A consonant smile arc with proper gingival exposure when smiling was obtained by vertical and torque control of the maxillary incisors using miniscrews (Fig. 11). The overall treatment time was 30 months.
      Fig 9
      Fig. 9Case 2: Pretreatment photographs and lateral cephalogram.
      Fig 10
      Fig. 10Case 2: Total intrusion of the maxillary and mandibular dentitions, and anterior teeth retraction with each maxillary and mandibular four buccal miniscrews. Red circles are the center of resistances of the maxillary and mandibular dentition with extraction of the maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars. Violet circles are the center of resistances of the maxillary and mandibular six anterior teeth.
      Fig 11
      Fig. 11Case 2: Posttreatment photographs and lateral cephalogram and pre- and posttreatment superimposition.

      Case 3: Backward rotation of OP with miniscrews in a hypodivergent adolescent patient with a reverse smile arc

      A 15-year-old female patient presented with a severe proclination of her maxillary incisors and a reverse smile arc. The diagnostic records revealed a dental Class II with transverse deficiency of the premaxilla, labioversion of the maxillary incisors, minor crowding in both arches, and mandibular dental midline deviation to the left side. She displayed a hypodivergent facial pattern and insufficient maxillary incisor exposure when smiling (Fig. 12). Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) was applied for expansion of her maxilla and to gain space for the uprighting of her maxillary incisors. Interradicular miniscrews in both arches were used for distalization of the maxillary dentition and backward rotation of the OP (Fig. 13). A favorable facial profile and Class I dental relationship was accomplished with backward rotation of OP (intrusion of the maxillary posterior and mandibular anterior teeth and extrusion of the maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior teeth), distalization of the maxillary dentition, and increased anterior facial height. A consonant smile arc with an appropriate maxillary incisor exposure when smiling was obtained by extrusion and uprighting of the maxillary incisors and intrusion of the mandibular incisors using miniscrews (Fig. 14). The overall treatment time was 19 months.
      Fig 12
      Fig. 12Case 3: Pretreatment photographs and radiographs.
      Fig 13
      Fig. 13Case 3: Total distalization of the maxillary dentition and backward rotation of the occlusal plane with maxillary and mandibular interradicular miniscrews. Brackets with MBT prescription were bonded upside down to give lingual crown torque on the maxillary incisors.
      Fig 14
      Fig. 14Case 3: Posttreatment photographs and radiographs and pre- and posttreatment superimposition.

      Case 4: MARPE and total distalization of the mandibular dentition in a skeletal Class III normovergent adolescent patient with mandibular asymmetry

      A 13-year-old female patient complained of mandibular prognathism and asymmetry. She showed lower lip protrusion, a slight concave profile, and 3.5 mm chin deviation and 2.5 mm mandibular dental midline deviation to the right side. She displayed Class III dental relationship with transverse discrepancy and insufficient maxillary incisor exposure when smiling (Fig. 15). MARPE was applied for expansion and slight forward movement of the maxilla after maxillary expansion
      • Song KT
      • Park JH
      • Moon W
      • Chae JM
      • Kang KH
      Three-dimensional changes of the zygomaticomaxillary complex after mini-implant assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
      ,
      • Lee DW
      • Park JH
      • Moon W
      • Seo HY
      • Chae J
      Effects of bicortical anchorage on pterygopalatine suture opening with microimplant-assisted maxillary skeletal expansion.
      and total distalization of the mandibular dentition with interradicular miniscrews in the mandible for camouflage treatment. During distalization of the mandibular dentition, lingual root torque (approximately 20°) was applied on the mandibular incisors for bodily and intrusive movement (Fig. 16). A favorable facial profile and Class I dental relationship was accomplished with protraction and extrusion of the maxillary dentition, and total distalization of the mandibular dentition. The maxillary incisor exposure increased with elastics and intrusion of the mandibular anterior teeth using miniscrews, which improved smile esthetics (Fig. 17). The overall treatment time was 16 months.
      Fig 15
      Fig. 15Case 4: Pretreatment photographs and radiographs.
      Fig 16
      Fig. 16Case 4: Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE), total distalization of the mandibular dentition with mandibular interradicular miniscrews, and elastics.
      Fig 17
      Fig. 17Case 4: Posttreatment photographs and radiographs and pre- and posttreatment superimposition.

      Conclusions

      MIP should be carefully considered to achieve favorable facial and smile esthetics. Consequently, MIP-based orthodontic treatment with proper biomechanics using miniscrews is essential to obtain an esthetic smile and facial balance.

      Patient consent

      Consent to publish the case report was obtained.

      Funding

      No funding or grant support.

      Author contributions

      All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for Authorship.

      Declaration of competing interest

      The authors reported no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to influence the work reported in this paper.

      References

        • Ackerman JL
        • Proffit WR
        • Sarver DM.
        The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
        Clin Orthod Res. 1999; 2: 49-52
        • Choi SH
        • Jeon JY
        • Lee KJ
        • Hwang CJ.
        Clinical applications of miniscrews that broaden the scope of non-surgical orthodontic treatment.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 24S1: 48-58
        • Lee KJ
        • Kim SJ.
        Advanced biomechanics for total arch movement and non-surgical treatment for hyperdivergent faces.
        Semin Orthod. 2018; 24: 83-94
        • Chae JM.
        A new protocol of Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 100-109
        • Park JH
        • Heo S
        • Tai K
        • Kojima Y
        • Kook YA
        • Chae JM.
        Biomechanical considerations for total distalization of the mandibular dentition in the treatment of Class III malocclusion.
        Semin Orthod. 2020; 26: 148-156
        • Kawamura J
        • Park JH
        • Kojima Y
        • Tamaya N
        • Kook YA
        • Kyung HM
        • Chae JM.
        Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the maxillary dentition: a finite element study.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 160: 259-265
        • Jo AR
        • Mo SS
        • Lee KJ
        • Sung SJ
        • Chun YS.
        Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition.
        Korean J Orthod. 2017; 47: 21-30
        • Jeong GM
        • Sung SJ
        • Lee KJ
        • Chun YS
        • Mo SS.
        Finite-element investigation of the center of resistance of the maxillary dentition.
        Korean J Orthod. 2009; 39: 83-94
        • Chae JM
        • Park JH
        • Kojima Y
        • Tai K
        • Kook YA
        • Kyung HM.
        Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the mandibular dentition: a finite element study.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155: 388-397
        • Machado AW.
        Mechanics to enhance facial and smile esthetics.
        Semin Orthod. 2020; 26: 117-125
        • Holdaway RA.
        A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I.
        Am J Orthod. 1983; 84: 1-28
        • Holdaway RA.
        A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
        Am J Orthod. 1984; 85: 279-293
        • Arnett GW
        • Jelic JS
        • Kim J
        • Cummings DR
        • Beress A
        • Worley Jr, CM
        • Chung B
        • Bergman R
        Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116: 239-253
        • Sarver DM.
        The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 120: 98-111
        • Al Taki A
        • Yaqoub S
        • Hassan M
        Legan-burstone soft tissue profile values in a Circassian adult sample.
        J Orthod Sci. 2018; 7: 18
        • Jeelani W
        • Fida M
        • Shaikh A.
        The maxillary incisor display at rest: analysis of the underlying components.
        Dental Press J Orthod. 2018; 23: 48-55
        • Ezquerra F
        • Berrazueta MJ
        • Ruiz-Capillas A
        • Arregui JS.
        New approach to the gummy smile.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 1143-1150
        • Sangalli L
        • Dalessandri D
        • Bonetti S
        • Mandelli G
        • Visconti L
        • Savoldi F.
        Proposed parameters of optimal central incisor positioning in orthodontic treatment planning: a systematic review.
        Korean J Orthod. 2022; 52: 53-65
        • Janzen EK.
        A balanced smile–a most important treatment objective.
        Am J Orthod. 1977; 72: 359-372
        • Klontz HA.
        Facial balance and harmony: an attainable objective for the patient with a high mandibular plane angle.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114: 176-188
        • Zarif Najafi H
        • Oshagh M
        • Khalili MH
        • Torkan S
        Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination in smiling profiles with respect to mandibular position.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148: 387-395
        • Hulsey CM.
        An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile.
        Am J Orthod. 1970; 57: 132-144
        • Sarver DM
        • Ackerman MB.
        Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124: 116-127
        • Lee KJ
        • Choi SH
        • Choi TH
        • Shi KK
        • Keum BT.
        Maxillary transverse expansion in adults: rationale, appliance design, and treatment outcomes.
        Semin Orthod. 2018; 24: 52-65
        • Chae JM.
        Nonextraction treatment of Class II division 2 in an adult patient using microimplant anchorage (MIA).
        Korean J Orthod. 2005; 35: 485-494
        • Polo M.
        Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) for the neuromuscular correction of excessive gingival display on smiling (gummy smile).
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 195-203
        • Hwang WS
        • Hur MS
        • Hu KS
        • Song WC
        • Koh KS
        • Baik HS
        • Kim ST
        • Kim HJ
        • Lee KJ.
        Surface anatomy of the lip elevator muscles for the treatment of gummy smile using botulinum toxin.
        Angle Orthod. 2009; 79: 70-77
        • Lamarque S.
        The importance of occlusal plane control during orthodontic mechanotherapy.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107: 548-558
        • Sarver DM.
        Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148: 380-386
        • Batwa W
        • Hunt NP
        • Petrie A
        • Gill D.
        Effect of occlusal plane on smile attractiveness.
        Angle Orthod. 2012; 82: 218-223
        • Park JH
        • Yu J
        • Bullen R.
        Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with conventional orthodontic therapy.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151: 804-811
        • Park JH
        • Emamy M
        • Lee SH.
        Adult skeletal Class III correction with camouflage orthodontic treatment.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156: 858-869
        • Nakamura M
        • Kawanabe N
        • Kataoka T
        • Murakami T
        • Yamashiro T
        • Kamioka H.
        Comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes between temporary anchorage devices and Class III elastics in Class III malocclusions.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151: 1116-1124
        • Maulik C
        • Nanda R.
        Dynamic smile analysis in young adults.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132: 307-315
        • Mangal U
        • Park JH
        • Lim SH
        • Choi SK
        • Chae JM.
        Control of occlusal plane in orthognathic surgery.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Clin Companion. 2021; 1: 43-54
        • Parrini S
        • Rossini G
        • Castroflorio T
        • Fortini A
        • Deregibus A
        • Debernardi C.
        Laypeople's perceptions of frontal smile esthetics: a systematic review.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150: 740-750
        • Hayashida H
        • Ioi H
        • Nakata S
        • Takahashi I
        • Counts AL.
        Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults.
        Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33: 419-426
        • Mirabella D
        • Bacconi S
        • Gracco A
        • Lombardo L
        • Siciliani G.
        Upper lip changes correlated with maxillary incisor movement in 65 orthodontically treated adult patients.
        World J Orthod. 2008; 9: 337-348
        • Li H
        • Cao T
        • Zhou H
        • Hou Y.
        Lip position analysis of young women with different skeletal patterns during posed smiling using 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155: 64-70
        • Lima APB
        • Conti ACCF
        • Filho LC
        • Cardoso MA
        • Almeida-Pedrin RR.
        Influence of facial pattern in smile attractiveness regarding gingival exposure assessed by dentists and laypersons.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155: 224-233
        • Song KT
        • Park JH
        • Moon W
        • Chae JM
        • Kang KH
        Three-dimensional changes of the zygomaticomaxillary complex after mini-implant assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156: 653-662
        • Lee DW
        • Park JH
        • Moon W
        • Seo HY
        • Chae J
        Effects of bicortical anchorage on pterygopalatine suture opening with microimplant-assisted maxillary skeletal expansion.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159: 502-511