Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 25, ISSUE 1, P36-45, March 2019

Download started.

Ok

CBCT evaluation of condylar changes in children with unilateral posterior crossbites and a functional shift

Published:February 11, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2019.02.005

      Abstract

      Posterior crossbite is one of the most frequently occurring malocclusions in adolescents with a prevalence of 7% to 23%. The most common form of posterior crossbite is a unilateral posterior crossbite with a functional side shift. It has been suggested that functional posterior crossbites (FUPXB) may result in right-to-left-side differences in the condyle fossa relationship, resulting in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) problems. The objective of this study was to determine if pathological position of the condyles can cause condylar signs or symptoms like degenerative joint disease (DJD) or juvenile condylar resorption (JCR), or if the position of the condyle is just an altered position within the TMJ. Sixty patients with an average age of 9.6years were randomly selected from the office of one of the investigators (T.S.). The study group consisted of 29 patients with a FUPXB and the control group had 31 patients with no posterior crossbite. All patients had multislice CT scans of the TMJ taken as part of the orthodontic records. Transverse widths were measured at the skeletal base and the dentoalveolar base. Molar inclinations, condylar angulations, condylar anterior joint space, superior joint space, and posterior joint space were measured. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare different measurements between groups and paired sample t-tests were used to compare differences within the same patient. Reliability of measurements were determined using pairwise correlation. For dentoalveolar measurements of transverse width, the maxillomandibular difference for the study group was -8.2 mm and for the control group was -4.0 mm. No significant differences were found between the molar inclinations, condylar width, angulation, or any joint space measurements between the two groups. A total of 61.3% of the subjects in the control group and 72.4% in the study group had a radiographic sign of joint disease. The lack of condylar positional differences between the control and crossbite groups suggests that TMJ signs and symptoms in the study group may be related to remodeling in the TMJ instead.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seminars in Orthodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thilander B
        • Wahlund S
        • Lennartsson B
        The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite.
        Eur J Orthod. 1984; 6: 25-34
        • Kurol J
        • Berglund L
        Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of early treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition.
        Eur J Orthod. 1992; 14: 173-179
        • Infante PF
        An epidemiologic study of finger habits in preschool children, as related to malocclusion, socioeconomic status, race, sex, and size of community.
        ASDC J Dent Child. 1976; 43: 33-38
        • Kutin G
        • Hawes RR
        Posterior cross-bites in the deciduous and mixed dentitions.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1969; 56: 491-504
        • Thilander B
        • Lennartsson B
        A study of children with unilateral posterior crossbite, treated and untreated, in the deciduous dentition–occlusal and skeletal characteristics of significance in predicting the long-term outcome.
        J Orofac Orthop. 2002; 63: 371-383
        • Foster TD
        • Day AJ
        A survey of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in a shropshire school population.
        Br J Orthod. 1974; 1: 73-78
        • Fuentes MA
        • Opperman LA
        • Buschang P
        • Bellinger LL
        • Carlson DS
        • Hinton RJ
        Lateral functional shift of the mandible: part I. effects on condylar cartilage thickness and proliferation.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 153-159
        • Infante PF
        Malocclusion in the deciduous dentition in white, black, and Apache Indian children.
        Angle Orthod. 1975; 45: 213-218
        • Schröder U
        • Schröder I
        Early treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite in children with bilaterally contracted maxillae.
        Eur J Orthod. 1984; 6: 65-69
        • Modéer T
        • Odenrick L
        • Lindner A
        Sucking habits and their relation to posterior cross-bite in 4-year-old children.
        Scand J Dent Res. 1982; 90: 323-328
        • Ogaard B
        • Larsson E
        • Lindsten R
        The effect of sucking habits, cohort, sex, intercanine arch widths, and breast or bottle feeding on posterior crossbite in Norwegian and Swedish 3-year-old children.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106: 161-166
        • Subtelny JD
        Oral respiration: facial maldevelopment and corrective dentofacial orthopedics.
        Angle Orthod. 1980; 50: 147-164
        • Bresolin D
        • Shapiro PA
        • Shapiro GG
        • Chapko MK
        • Dassel S
        Mouth breathing in allergic children: its relationship to dentofacial development.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1983; 83: 334-340
        • Cheng MC
        • Enlow DH
        • Papsidero M
        • Broadbent Jr, BH
        • Oyen O
        • Sabat M
        Developmental effects of impaired breathing in the face of the growing child.
        Angle Orthod. 1988; 58: 309-320
        • Sergl HG
        • Farmland M
        Experiments with unilateral bite planes in rabbits.
        Angle Orthod. 1975; 45: 108-114
        • Kantomaa T
        • Pirttiniemi P
        Differences in biologic response of the mandibular condyle to forward traction or opening of the mandible. an experimental study in the rat.
        Acta Odontol Scand. 1996; 54: 138-144
        • Isotupa KP
        • Carlson DS
        • Mäkinen KK
        Influence of asymmetric occlusal relationships and decreased maxillary width on the growth of the facial skeleton in the guinea pig.
        Ann Anat. 1992; 174: 447-451
        • Fuentes MA
        • Opperman LA
        • Buschang P
        • Bellinger LL
        • Carlson DS
        • Hinton RJ
        Lateral functional shift of the mandible: part II. effects on gene expression in condylar cartilage.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 160-166
        • Liu C
        • Kaneko S
        • Soma K
        Effects of a mandibular lateral shift on the condyle and mandibular bone in growing rats.
        Angle Orthod. 2007; 77: 787-793
        • Ikeda K
        • Kawamura A
        Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 495-501
        • Hesse KL
        • Artun J
        • Joondeph DR
        • Kennedy DB
        Changes in condylar postition and occlusion associated with maxillary expansion for correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 111: 410-418
        • Leonardi R
        • Caltabiano M
        • Cavallini C
        • et al.
        Condyle fossa relationship associated with functional posterior crossbite, before and after rapid maxillary expansion.
        Angle Orthod. 2012; 82: 1040-1046
        • Cho HJ
        A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
        J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43: 235
        • Vanarsdall Jr., RL
        Transverse dimension and long-term stability.
        Semin Orthod. 1999; 5: 171-180
        • Miner RM
        • Al Qabandi S
        • Rigali PH
        • Will LA
        Cone-beam computed tomography transverse analysis. part I: normative data.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142: 300-307
        • Tsiklakis K
        • Syriopoulos K
        • Stamatakis HC
        Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33: 196-201
        • Honda K
        • Arai Y
        • Kashima M
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33: 391-395
        • Rodrigues AF
        • Fraga MR
        • Vitral RWF
        Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in class I malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 192-198
        • Rodrigues AF
        • Fraga MR
        • Vitral RWF
        Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in class II division 1 and class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 199-206
        • Brin I
        • Ben-Bassat Y
        • Blustein Y
        • et al.
        Skeletal and functional effects of treatment for unilateral posterior crossbite.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 109: 173-179
        • Vitral RWF
        • Telles CDS
        Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in class II division 1 subdivision patients: condylar symmetry.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121: 369-375
        • Vitral RWF
        • Telles CdS
        • Fraga MR
        • et al.
        Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions: condyle-fossa relationship.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126: 48-52
        • Kinniburgh RD
        • Major PW
        • Nebbe B
        • West K
        • Glover KE
        Osseous morphology and spatial relationships of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons of normal and anterior disc positions.
        Angle Orthod. 2000; 70: 70-78
        • Major PW
        • Kinniburgh RD
        • Nebbe B
        • Prasad NG
        • Glover KE
        Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joint osseous articular surface contour and spatial relationships associated with disc displacement and disc length.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121: 152-161
        • Katsavrias EG
        • Halazonetis DJ
        Condyle and fossa shape in class II and class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128: 337-346
        • Lam PH
        • Sadowsky C
        • Omerza F
        Mandibular asymmetry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115: 569-575
        • Wang MQ
        • He JJ
        • Li G
        • Widmalm SE
        The effect of physiological nonbalanced occlusion on the thickness of the temporomandibular joint disc: a pilot autopsy study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99: 148-152
        • Myers DR
        • Barenie JT
        • Bell RA
        • Williamson EH
        Condylar position in children with functional posterior crossbites: before and after crossbite correction.
        Pediatr Dent. 1980; 2: 190-194
        • Yamada K
        • Tsuruta A
        • Hanada K
        • Hayashi T
        Morphology of the articular eminence in temporomandibular joints and condylar bone change.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 438-444