Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 9, ISSUE 4, P218-222, December 2003

Download started.

Ok

Friction: an overview

  • P.Emile Rossouw
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to Dr. P. Emile Rossouw, BSc, BChD, BChD (Hons), MChD, PhD, FRCD(C), Professor and Clinic Director, Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX 75246, USA
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      Binding of the bracket on the guiding archwire (bracket-archwire interface) occurs through a series of tipping and uprighting movements (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3); it signifies orthodontic tooth movement, moreover, it creates friction.
      • Farrant S.D.
      An evaluation of different methods of canine retraction.
      Figure thumbnail GR1
      Figure 1A patient with congenitally absent maxillary lateral incisors; the treatment objective is to utilize the maxillary canine in the lateral incisor position. Friction is needed to rotate and upright this mal-positioned canine. Note the figure 8 ligation of the central incisors to prevent inappropriate movement, an example of creating advantageous friction. Bracket design differences, as well as method of ligation, influence the amount of friction.
      Figure thumbnail GR2
      Figure 2A continuation of treatment also necessitates uprighting of the canine in pursuit of an ideal root-crown relationship. The frictionless posterior wire-bracket interface allows the archwire to gently slide posteriorly and protrude distally from the maxillary molar buccal tube.
      Figure thumbnail GR3
      Figure 3The maxillary canine is in position as a replacement for the lateral incisor and ready for esthetic recontouring where needed. These goals were attained by utilizing both friction and/or no friction as part of the clinical treatment mechanotherapy.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seminars in Orthodontics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Farrant S.D.
        An evaluation of different methods of canine retraction.
        Br J Orthod. 1976; 4: 5-15
        • Nanda R.
        • Ghosh J.
        Biomechanical considerations in sliding mechanics.
        in: Nanda R. Biomechanics in Clinical Orthodontics. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA1997: 188-217
        • Drescher D.
        • Bourauel C.
        • Schumacher H.A.
        Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989; 96: 397-404
        • Dickson J.A.S.
        • Jones S.P.
        • Davies E.H.
        A comparison of the frictional characteristics of five initial alignment wires and stainless steel brackets at three bracket to wire angulations.
        Br J Orthod. 1994; 21: 15-22
        • Kapila S.
        • Angolkar P.D.
        • Duncanson M.G.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990; 98: 100-109
        • Omana H.M.
        • Moore R.N.
        • Bagby M.D.
        Frictional properties of metal and ceramic brackets.
        J Clin Orthod. 1992; 27: 425-432
        • Bednar J.R.
        • Gruendeman G.W.
        • Sandrik J.L.
        A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991; 100: 513-522
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • Nanda R.S.
        • Morimoto N.
        • et al.
        A study of force application, amount of retarding force, and bracket width in sliding mechanics.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996; 109: 50-56
        • Nikolai R.J.
        Bioengineering analysis of orthodontic mechanics. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA1985: 53-56
        • DeFranco D.J.
        • Spiller R.E.
        • von Fraunhofer J.A.
        Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
        Angle Orthod. 1995; 65: 63-72
        • Schwartz A.M.
        Tissue changes incidental to orthodontic tooth movement.
        Int J Orthod. 1932; 18: 331-352
        • Storey E.
        • Smith R.
        Force in orthodontics and its relation to tooth movement.
        Aust J Dent. 1952; 56: 11-18
        • Quinn T.B.
        • Yoshikawa D.K.
        A reassessment of force magnitude in orthodontics.
        Am J Orthod. 1985; 88: 252-260
        • Angolkar P.D.
        • Kapila S.
        • Duncanson M.G.
        • Nanda R.S.
        Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990; 98: 499-506
        • Ogata R.H.
        • Nanda R.S.
        • Duncanson M.G.
        • et al.
        Frictional resistances in stainless steel bracket-wire combinations with effects of vertical deflections.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996; 109: 535-542
        • Stoner M.M.
        Force control in clinical practice.
        Am J Orthod. 1960; 46: 163-168
        • Paulson R.C.
        • Spiedel T.M.
        • Isaacson R.J.
        A laminographic study of cuspid retraction versus molar anchorage loss.
        Angle Orthod. 1970; 40: 20-27
        • Kusy R.P.
        • Whitley J.Q.
        Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials.
        Seminars Orthod. 1997; 3: 166-177
        • Downing A.
        • McCabe J.
        • Gordon P.
        A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
        Br J Orthod. 1994; 21: 349-357
        • Edward G.D.
        • Davies E.H.
        • Jones S.P.
        The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires.
        Br J Orthod. 1995; 22: 145-153
        • Braun S.
        • Bluestein M.
        • Moore K.
        • et al.
        Friction in perspective.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999; 115: 619-627
        • Frank C.A.
        • Nikolai R.J.
        A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire.
        Am J Orthod. 1980; 78: 593-609
        • Articolo L.C.
        • Kusy R.P.
        Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999; 115: 39-51
        • Kusy R.P.
        Orthodontic biomechanics.
        Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000; 117: 589-591
        • Kusy R.P.
        Ongoing innovations in biomechanics and materials for the new millennium.
        Angle Orthod. 2000; 70: 366-376
        • Ho K.S.
        • West V.C.
        Friction resistance between edgewise brackets and archwires.
        Aust Orthod J. 1991; 12: 95-99