Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 16, Issue 3 , Pages 193-198, September 2010

Maxillary Canines in Patients With Multiple Congenitally Missing Teeth: A Roentgenographic Study

  • Yocheved Ben-Bassat

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Hebrew University, Hadassah, School of Dental Medicine, founded by the Alpha Omega Fraternity, Jerusalem, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Dr. Y. Ben-Bassat, Department of Orthodontics, HU-Hadassah SDM, PO Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
  • ,
  • Ilana Brin

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Hebrew University, Hadassah, School of Dental Medicine, founded by the Alpha Omega Fraternity, Jerusalem, Israel

A group of 122 patients with multiple (at least 3) congenitally missing teeth was screened roentgenographically for the condition of their maxillary canines (missing, malposed, impacted, and normally erupted). Full information was available for 89 patients of the original group, who were divided into 2 subgroups, one with maxillary lateral incisors present (A) and the other with missing lateral incisors (B). Their chronologic age was found to be 12.4 ± 2.9 years, which was close to their dental age, 12.4 ± 2.1 years. The position of the maxillary canines was determined by a modified sector method. Of the expected number of maxillary canines, 20.4% were missing. In the group with full documentation, 42.4% were mesially displaced (most of them adjacent to a missing lateral incisor), whereas 5.6% were distally displaced. Of the mesially displaced canines, 5.7% were eventually impacted. Altogether, only 26.4% of the expected canines were positioned in their correct locations at the time of examination, mostly adjacent to a lateral incisor. It is concluded that the prevalence of affected maxillary canines (impacted, displaced) among patients with multiple congenitally missing teeth is relatively high. Because of the small number of impacted canines in each category of severity of absence no meaningful conclusions could be drawn in this regard.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1073-8746(10)00039-3

doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2010.05.006

Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 16, Issue 3 , Pages 193-198, September 2010