Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 132-158, June 2009

Effects of Mandibular Advancement Device (MAD) on Airway Dimensions Assessed With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

  • Jennifer A. Haskell

      Affiliations

    • Alumna, School of Dentistry and Graduate School, Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Dr J. A. Haskell, Department of Orthodontics, Eastman Dental Center, 625 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14620
  • ,
  • John McCrillis

      Affiliations

    • Practitioner, Louisville, KY
  • ,
  • Bruce S. Haskell

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY and Div. of Orthodontics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • ,
  • James P. Scheetz

      Affiliations

    • Professor, University of Louisville, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Prosthodontics, and Restorative Dentistry, Louisville, KY
  • ,
  • William C. Scarfe

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
  • ,
  • Allan G. Farman

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY

Upper airway constriction is an important contributing factor to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which may be treated in a palliative manner with mandibular advancement devices (MADs) to increase patency of the airway. It may be the treatment of choice for affected individuals who cannot use a continuous positive airway pressure device or who are not candidates for surgical correction of OSA. The specific distance applied during mandibular advancement, however, is often arbitrarily determined. This project uses cone beam computed tomography imaging in patients with OSA to determine a quantifiable relationship between airway patency and mandibular advancement. This correlation may be the basis to create an ideal technique to diagnose and treat patients having OSA. Twenty-six subjects successfully treated for OSA with a MAD received 2 cone beam computed tomography scans; 1 with and 1 without the MAD. Volumetric, cross-sectional, and cephalometric measurements were gathered from these scans. With the use of linear regression statistical analysis, specific predictor parameters have been identified for volumetric and cross-sectional airway information. An average oropharyngeal volume increase of approximately 2800 mm3 was achieved with MAD therapy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 20.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The present study is currently under IRB approval at the University of Louisville as of April 20, 2006. It has undergone 2 annual reviews and is not due for another annual review until April 21, 2009. Risk to the subjects is from radiation exposure using a FDA/CDRH approved device. The short and long-term risks of somatic and genetic damage at the level used in this study are considered negligible.

PII: S1073-8746(09)00019-X

doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2009.02.001

Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 15, Issue 2 , Pages 132-158, June 2009