Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 246-259 , December 2008

Beyond the Ligament: A Whole-Bone Periodontal View of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Falsification of Universal Alveolar Immutability

  • Michael O. Williams

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice in Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 424 Courthouse Road, Security Square, Gulfport, MS 39507
    • ,
  • Neal C. Murphy

      Affiliations

    • Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology & Affiliated Skeletal Research Center, Case Western Reserve University, School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Lecturer, Sections of Orthodontics UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Dr. Neal C. Murphy, 28920 Bardell Dr., Agoura Hills, CA 91301. Phone: (818) 889-6704

References 

  1. Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:410–417
  2. Frost HM. A 2003 Update of Bone Physiology and Wolff's Law for Clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:3–15
  3. Jee WS, Li XJ. Adaption of cancellous bone to overloading in the adult rat: a single photon absorptiometry and histomorphometry study. Anat Rec. 1990;277:418–426
  4. Burch JG. Periodontal Responses and Problems in Orthodontics. Chapter 21: Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedic Section, in Hardin J (ed): Clarks Clinical Dentistry. Vol. 2. St. Louis: Mosby-Yearbook; 1997;
  5. Melsen B. Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:151–158
  6. Baumrind S. A reconsideration of the propriety of the “pressure-tension” hypothesis. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:12–22
  7. McNamara JA. The role of the transverse dimension in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, in McNamara JA (ed): Growth Modification: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Craniofacial Growth Series No. 35. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan Press; 1999;153-192
  8. Epker BN, Frost HM. Correlation of bone resorption and formation with the physical behavior of loaded bone. J Dent Res. 1965;44:33–41
  9. Burr DB, Schaffler MB, Yang KH, et al. Skeletal change in response to altered strain environments: is woven bone a response to elevated strain?. Bone. 1989;10:223–233
  10. Murphy NC. In vivo tissue engineering for orthodontists: a modest first step, in Davidovitch Z, Mah J, Suthanarak S (eds): Biological Mechanisms for Tooth Eruption, Resorption and Movement. Boston: Harvard Society for the Advancement of Orthodontics; 2006;385-410
  11. van der Meulen MCH, Huiskes R. Why mechanobiology? A survey article. J Biomech. 2002;35:401–414
  12. Singh GD. On growth and treatment: the spatial matrix hypothesis, in McNamara JA Jr (ed): Growth and Treatment. Craniofacial Growth Series No. 41. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2004;197-239
  13. Johnston LE. Fear and loathing in orthodontics: notes on the death of theory. Br J Orthod. 1990;17:333–341
  14. Johnston LE. Growth Modification: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Craniofacial Growth Series No. 35. In:  McNamara JA editors. Growing Jaws for fun and profit: a modest proposal. Ann Arbor, Center for Human Growth and Development: University of Michigan Press; 1999;63-86
  15. Ilizarov GA, Ledyaev VI, Shitin VP. The courses of reparative regeneration of cortical bone in distraction osteosynthesis under various conditions of fragment fixation. Eksperimental'naia khirurgiia i anesteziologiia. 1969;6:3–12
  16. Ilizarov G. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1989;238:249–281
  17. Popper K. The Logic of Scientific discovery. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2002;
  18. Wagle N, Do NN, Jack YU, et al. Fractal analysis of the PDL-bone interface and implications for orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:655–661
  19. Frost HM. The Utah Paradigm of Skeletal Physiology. Pueblo, CO: International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal interactions (ISMNI); 2002;
  20. Frost HM. A Update of Bone Physiology and Wolff's Law for Clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:3–15
  21. Longhurst P, Gillett R, Johnson NW. Electron microscope quantitation of inflammatory infiltrates in childhood gingivitis. J Periodont Res. 1980;15:255–266
  22. Engelking G, Zachrisson BU. Effects of incisor repositioning on monkey periodontium after expansion through the cortical plate. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:23–32
  23. Thilander B, Nyman S, Karring T. Bone regeneration in alveolar bone dehiscences related to orthodontic tooth movements. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5:105–114
  24. Lindskog-Stokland BL, Wennström JL, Nyman S, Thilander B. Orthodontic tooth movement into edentulous areas with reduced bone height. An experimental study in the dog. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:89–96
  25. Cacciafesta V. Dr. Birte Melsen on adult orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod. 2006;12:703–716
  26. Hom BM, Turley PK. The effects of space closure of the mandibular first molar area in adults. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:457–469
  27. Ferguson DJ, Wilcko WM, Wilcko MT. Selective alveolar decortication for rapid surgical-orthodontic (sic) of skeletal malocclusion treatment. In:  Bell WH,  Guerrero CA editor. Distraction of the Facial Skeleton. Hamilton, BC: Decker, Inc; 2007;p. 199–203
  28. Melsen B. Tissue reaction to orthodontic tooth movement—a new paradigm. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:671–681
  29. Norton LA, Melsen B. Functional appliances. In:  Melsen B editors. Current Controversies in Orthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1991;p. 116
  30. Pigliucci M. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture: Syntheses in Ecology and Evolution. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001;
  31. Behrents RG. Growth in the Aging Craniofacial Skeleton Craniofacial Growth Series. 17. Ann Arbor: Needham Press; 1986;
  32. Hartsfield JK. Genetics and Orthodontics. In:  Graber TM,  Vanarsdall RL,  Vig KWL editor. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. 4th. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005;p. 106–109
  33. Waddington CH. The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology. New York: McMillan; 1957;
  34. Siegal ML, Bergman A. Waddington's canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10528–10532
  35. Stearns SC. Progress on canalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;10229–10230
  36. Slack JM, Waddington CH. The last renaissance biologist. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:889–895
  37. In:  Alperts B,  Johnson A,  Lewis J editor. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th. New York: The Taylor and Francis Group Publishers; 2002;p. 433
  38. Ponseti IV. Common errors in the treatment of congenital clubfoot. Int Orthop. 1997;21:137–141
  39. Little RM. Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment. Br J Orthod. 1990;17:235–241
  40. Johnston LE. The functional matrix hypothesis: reflections in a jaundiced eye. In:  McNamara JA editors. Factors Affecting the Growth of the Midface (Craniofacial Growth Series No. 6). Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan Press; 1976;p. 131–168
  41. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. In: 2nd rev. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Foundations of the Unity of Science. 2:Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970;No. 2
  42. Shirazi M, Nilforoushan D, Alghasi H. The role of nitric oxide in orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:211–215
  43. Djeu G, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. Correlation between mandibular central incisor proclination and gingival recession during fixed appliance therapy. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:238–245
  44. Jeremy J, Mao JJ, Wang X, Mooney MP, Kopher RA, Nudera JA. Strain induced osteogenesis of the craniofacial suture upon controlled delivery of low frequency cyclic forces. Front Biosci. 2003;8:10–17
  45. Charras GT, Lehenkari PP, Horton MA. Atomic force microscopy can be used to mechanically stimulate osteoblasts and evaluate cellular strain distributions. Ultramicroscopy. 2001;86:85–95
  46. Charras GT, Mike A, Horton MA. Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. Biophys J. 2002;82:2970–2981

PII: S1073-8746(08)00044-3

doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2008.07.003

Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 246-259 , December 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution