The Damon Passive Self-Ligating Appliance System

References 

1. Damon DH. Treatment of the face with biocompatible orthodontics. In:  Graber TM,  Vanarsdall RL,  Vig KWL editor. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. St Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005;p. 753–831
2. Srinivas S. Comparison of canine retraction with self-ligated and conventional ligated brackets—a clinical study (Thesis in fulfillment of postgraduate degree). Chennai, India: Tamilnadu University; 2003;
3. Harradine NWT. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;4:220–227
   • CrossRef
4. Maijer R, Smith DC. Time saving with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:29–31
   • MEDLINE
5. Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:472–480
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (3295 KB)
   • CrossRef
6. Voudouris JC. Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:119–140
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (3407 KB)
   • CrossRef
7. Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional versus self-ligating brackets: the effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:395–399
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (172 KB)
   • CrossRef
8. Thomas S, Birnie DJ, Sherriff M. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self ligating brackets and two types of preadjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:589–596
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Pizzoni L, Raunholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:283–291
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
10. Khambay B, Millett D, Mc Hugh S. Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:327–332
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
11. Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:472–782
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (502 KB)
    • CrossRef
12. Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie DJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of preadjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:367–373
    • MEDLINE
13. Mah E, Bagby MD, Ngan PW, et al. Investigation of frictional resistance on orthodontic brackets when subjected to variable moments [abstract]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:A1
    • Full Text
14. Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:480–485
    • MEDLINE
15. Venezia AJ. Pure Begg and edgewise arch treatments: comparison of results. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:289–300
    • MEDLINE
16. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional edgewise brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:208–215
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (770 KB)
    • CrossRef
17. Cash AC, Good SA, MacDonald F. An evaluation of slot sizes in orthodontic brackets—are standards as expected?. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:450–453
    • MEDLINE
18. Bourauel C, Morina E, Eliades T. Torque capacity of self-ligating brackets compared with standard edgewise brackets (Abstracts of Lectures and Posters [abstract 115]). Amsterdam: European Orthodontic Society; 2005;
19. Pandis N, Strigon S, Eliades T. Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial. Orthod Clin Res. 2006;9:193–198
20. Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;4:228–234
21. Andrews LF. Straight-Wire: The concept and the appliance. San Diego: LA Wells and Co; 1989;
22. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Improving the 21st century healthcare system, in Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001;pp 39-60