« Previous
Next »
Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 14, Issue 1
, Pages 5-18
, March 2008
The History and Development of Self-Ligating Brackets
References
- . The Russell attachment and its improved advantages. Int J Orthod Dent Child. 1935;21:837–840
- . Round table—the Edgelok bracket. J Clin Orthod. 1972;6:613–623
- . The SPEED appliance: a 14 year update on this unique self-ligating orthodontic mechanism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:217–223
- . The clinical use of Activa self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:319–328
- . The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:52–61
- . The Damon low friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:670–680
- Force decay and deformation of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:1–11
- . A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:472–480
- . Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:327–332
- . Time saving with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:29–31
- . Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:416–420
- Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:231–236
- . Bacterial colonisation associated with fixed orthodontic appliances (A scanning electron microscopy study). Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:475–484
- . Self-ligating brackets: where are we now?. J Orthod. 2003;30:262–273
- . Brackets’ shape influences friction. The Orthodontic Materials Insider. 2001;13:2–5
- . Magnitude of orthodontic forces and rate of bodily tooth movement (An experimental study). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:16–23
- . Efficacy of intra-arch mechanics using differential moments for achieving anchorage control in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:441–448
- . Comparison of canine retraction with self-ligated and conventional ligated brackets—a clinical study. Chennai, India: Thesis in fulfillment of postgraduate degree, Tamilnadu Medical University; 2003;
- . Some factors determining the evaluation of forces in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1957;43:32–46
- . Force systems from an ideal arch—large deflection considerations. Angle Orthod. 1989;59:11–16
- . Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:295–305
- . Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;4:220–227
- . Treatment time, outcome and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;4:228–234
- . Self-engaging brackets: passive vs. active. The Orthodontic Materials Insider. 1996;9:5–11
PII: S1073-8746(07)00067-9
doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2007.12.002
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 14, Issue 1
, Pages 5-18
, March 2008
