Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 178-185 , September 2006

Concepts on Control of the Anterior Teeth Using the Lingual Appliance

  • Rafi Romano

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Rafi Romano, DMD, MSc, 34 Habarzel St, Tel Aviv 69710, Israel. Phone: +972-3-6477878; Fax: +972-3-6477646

References 

  1. Yoshida N , Jost-Brinkmann PG , Koga Y , Mimaki N , Kobayashi K . Experimental evaluation of initial tooth displacement, center of resistance, and center of rotation under the influence of an orthodontic force . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2001;120:190–197
  2. Goren S , Zoizner R , Geron S , Romano R . Lingual orthodontics (LO) versus buccal orthodontics (BO) (biomechanical and clinical aspects) . J Lingual Orthod . 2002;3:1–7
  3. Geron S , Romano R , Brosh T . Vertical forces in labial and lingual orthodontics applied on maxillary incisors–a theoretical approach . Angle Orthod . 2004;7:195–201
  4. Gioka C , Eliades T . Materials-induced variation in the torque expression of preadjusted appliances . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2004;25:323–328
  5. Meling TR , Odegaard J . The effect of cross-sectional dimensional variations of square and rectangular chrome-cobalt archwires on torsion . Angle Orthod . 1998;68:239–248
  6. Sebanc J , Brantley WA , Pincsak JJ , Conover JP . Variability of effective root torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires . Am J Orthod . 1984;86:43–51
  7. Parkhouse RC . Rectangular wire and third-order torque (a new perspective) . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 1998;113:421–430
  8. Krishnan V , Kumar KJ . Mechanical properties and surface characteristics of three archwire alloys . Angle Orthod . 2004;74:825–831
  9. Geron S , Shpack N , Kandos S , Davidovitch M , Vardimon AD . Anchorage loss—a multifactorial response . Angle Orthod . 2003;73:730–737
  10. Mulligan TF . Common sense mechanics . J Clin Orthod . 1980;14:180–189
  11. Thorstenson GA , Kusy RP . Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2001;120:361–370
  12. Park JH , Lee YK , Lim BS , Kim CW . Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester . Angle Orthod . 2004;74:816–824
  13. Khambay B , Millett D , McHugh S . Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance . Eur J Orthod . 2005;27:302–308
  14. Kusy RP , Whitley JQ . Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states (influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement) . J Biomed Mater Res . 2000;52:797–811
  15. Mathews DP , Kokich VG . Managing treatment for the orthodontic patient with periodontal problems . Semin Orthod . 1997;3:21–38
  16. Diedrich PR . Orthodontic procedures improving periodontal prognosis . Dent Clin North Am . 1996;40:875–887
  17. Geron S . Managing the orthodontic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease (the lingual appliance) . World J Orthod . 2004;5:324–331
  18. Romano R . The Art of the Smile (Integrating Prosthodontics, Orthodontics, Periodontics, Dental Technology, and Plastic Surgery in Esthetic Dental Treatment) . Berlin, Germany: Quintessence; 2005;
  19. Stamm T , Weichman D . Relation between second and third order problems in lingual orthodontic treatment . J Lingual Orthod . 2001;1:5–11

PII: S1073-8746(06)00029-6

doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2006.05.005

Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 12, Issue 3 , Pages 178-185 , September 2006