« Previous
Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 11, Issue 2
, Pages 98-110
, June 2005
Reliability of Digital Versus Conventional Cephalometric Radiology: A Comparative Evaluation of Landmark Identification Error
References
-
.
Roentgen ray anthropometry of the skull
.
J Radiol
. 1922;3:230–231
-
.
Bedeutung der Rontgenfern und Abstands Aufnahme fur die Diagnostik der Kiefereanomalien
.
Fortschr Orthod
. 1931;1:231–258
-
.
A new x ray technique and its application to orthodontics
.
Angle Orthod1
. 1931;1:45–66
- . Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics (historical perspective, current status, and future developments) . Angle Orthod . 1999;69:491–506
- . An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry . J Orthod . 2002;29:66–69
- . Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography . Dentomaxillofac Radiol . 2000;29:52–56
- . Cephalometric digitization (a determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification) . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2001;119:472–481
- . At what resolution should I scan cephalometric radiographs? . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2004;125:118–119
- . Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry . Angle Orthod . 2000;70:387–392
- . Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography . Dent Clin North Am . 2000;44:273–297
- . A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: I. hard tissue . Semin Orthod . 2004;10:204–211
- . Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy and monitor displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique . Eur J Orthod . 1998;20:331–340
-
.
Diagnostic image quality in comparison of conventional and digital cephalometric radiographs [abstract]
.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol
. 1998;27:27
- . Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs (a human skull study) . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2002;122:635–642
- . The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry . Br J Orthod . 1974;1:95–101
- . A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis . Eur J Orthod . 1981;3:15–20
- . Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2000;118:535–540
- . The reliability of head film measurements: 1. Landmark identification . Am J Orthod . 1971;60:111–127
-
.
Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility
(a meta analysis)
.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
. 1997;112:535–540
- . An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis . Am J Orthod . 1966;52:637–651
- . The reliability of head film measurements: 2. Conventional angular and linear measures . Am J Orthod . 1971;60:505–517
- . Precision in cephalometric landmark identification . Eur J Orthod . 1982;4:185–196
-
.
Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements
(guidelines for cephalometric analyses)
.
Clin Orthod Res
. 2000;3:29–36
-
.
Cephalometric reference planes—Sella nasion vs. Frankfort horizontal
.
J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg
. 1988;2:81–87
- . A comparison between the Frankfort horizontal and the Sella turcica-nasion as reference planes in cephalometric analysis . Acta Odontol Scand . 1957;15:1–13
-
.
The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis
.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
. 1995;5:537–540
PII: S1073-8746(05)00018-6
doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.002
© 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 11, Issue 2
, Pages 98-110
, June 2005
