Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 76-85 , June 2005

Adhesives in Orthodontics: Are We Pushing the Envelope in the Right Direction?

  • T. Scott Jenkins

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Dr. T. S. Jenkins, Department of Orthodontics, University of Maryland, 66 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201.

References 

  1. Angle EH . Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth—Angle‘s system . 1900;
  2. Proffit WR . In: Contemporary Orthodontics . St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1986;p. 294
  3. Proffit WR . In: Contemporary Orthodontics . St. Louis: Mosby; 2000;p. 385–416
  4. Buonocore MG . The Use of Adhesives in Dentistry . Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas; 1975;
  5. Buonocore M . A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface . J Dent Res . 1955;34:849
  6. Reynolds IR . A review of direct orthodontic bonding . Br J Orthod . 1979;171–178
  7. Zachrisson BU . Bonding in orthodontics . In:  Graber TM ,  Swain BF editor. Orthodontics (Current Principles and Techniques) . St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1985;p. 557–645
  8. Zachrisson BU . Bonding in Orthodontics . In:  Graber TM ,  Vanarsdall RL editor. Orthodontics (Current Principles and Techniques) . 3rd ed.. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 2000;p. 542–626
  9. Howells D , Jones P . In vitro evaluation of a cyanoacrylate bonding agent . Br J Orthod . 1989;75–78
  10. Linklater RA , Gordon PH . Bond failure patterns in vivo . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2003;123:534–539
  11. Willems G , Carels CEL , Verbeke G . In vitro peel/shear bond evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design . J Dent . 1997;25:271–278
  12. Willems G , Carels CEL , Verbeke G . In vitro peel/shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesive . J Dent . 1997;25:263–270
  13. Zachrisson BU . Post-treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics . Am J Orthod . 1977;173–189
  14. Tavas MA , Watts DC . An in vitro study . Br J Orthod . 1979;6:207–208
  15. Greenlaw R , Way DC , Galil KA . An in vitro evaluation of a visible light-cured resin as an alternative to conventional resin bonding systems . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 1989;96:214–220
  16. Millett DT , Gordon PH . A 5-year clinical review of bond failures with a no-mix adhesive . Eur J Orthod . 1994;16:203–211
  17. Reynolds IR , von Fraunhofer JA . Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth (the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size) . Br J Orthod . 1976;3:91–95
  18. de Rijk WG , Wood M , Thompson VP . Maximum likelihood estimates for the lifetime of bonded dental prostheses . J Dent Res . 1996;75:1700–1705
  19. Joseph V , Rossouw E . The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 1990;97:121–125
  20. Bishara S , Trulove T . Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study—part I. Background and methods . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 1990;98:145–153
  21. Kern M , Thompson VP . Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic (adhesive methods and their durability) . J Prosthet Dent . 1995;73:240–249
  22. Lew KK , Neo JC , Chew CL . Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using Panavia (an in vitro study) . Clin Mater . 1993;12:89–93
  23. Gange P . Bonding Successfully to All Types of Surfaces . Toronto, Ontario, Canada: American Association of Orthodontists; 2001; Annual AAO Meeting.

PII: S1073-8746(05)00006-X

doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.02.005

Seminars in Orthodontics
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 76-85 , June 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution